Should I consult other doctors?
Hello Doctor: This year, the X-ray report from the employee health check, conducted in a smoke-free environment without dust exposure, showed an abnormality in the left hilum of the lung.
After a follow-up appointment with the pulmonologist, the doctor reviewed the X-rays (the company has been conducting health checks at this hospital for four consecutive years), and noted that the X-rays from the past four years have shown no changes.
The doctor believes that this is likely a blood vessel issue, as I have a mitral valve problem, which may have caused the vessel to appear slightly enlarged.
(The previous three years did not show any abnormalities; the doctor mentioned that this could be due to differences in interpretation, and he believes they all appear the same.) The doctor stated that since there have been no changes over the four years, I can continue to monitor it, but to confirm whether it is indeed a blood vessel, a CT scan would be necessary.
Should I seek a second opinion from another hospital, or is it sufficient to continue monitoring through the annual health checks? Thank you.
Wan, 20~29 year old female. Ask Date: 2016/06/07
Dr. Zhou Ziguang reply Pulmonology
Hello: Other hospitals may provide similar statements.
If you want to confirm, a CT scan can be performed (but it involves higher radiation exposure).
Reply Date: 2016/06/07
More Info
When it comes to managing follow-up care after a lung cancer diagnosis, particularly in your case of having undergone surgery for a small adenocarcinoma, it's essential to weigh the risks and benefits of various imaging modalities against the potential for cancer recurrence. Your concerns about radiation exposure from imaging tests like CT scans and PET scans are valid, especially given your young age and the cumulative effects of radiation over time.
Understanding the Imaging Recommendations
1. MRI of the Brain and Whole Body PET Scan:
- The recommendation for an MRI of the brain and a whole-body PET scan is typically made to rule out metastasis, especially in cases of lung cancer. While the PET scan does expose you to radiation (approximately 10 mSv), it is a highly sensitive test for detecting cancer spread. The MRI, on the other hand, does not use ionizing radiation and is useful for assessing brain involvement.
- If you choose not to undergo these tests, the risk lies in potentially missing early signs of metastasis, which could affect treatment options and outcomes. However, if your initial staging indicated no lymph node involvement and the tumor was small, the likelihood of distant metastasis may be lower, which could justify a more conservative approach.
2. Follow-Up with Chest CT:
- The recommendation for follow-up chest CT scans every three months is standard practice for monitoring lung cancer survivors. Each CT scan typically delivers about 7 mSv of radiation. Given your history of a small tumor and the absence of lymph node involvement, this frequency may be appropriate, but it is essential to discuss your concerns about radiation exposure with your healthcare provider.
- Low-Dose CT (LDCT) is an excellent alternative for lung cancer surveillance. LDCT significantly reduces radiation exposure (approximately 1-2 mSv) while still providing adequate imaging to monitor for changes in lung nodules or new lesions. If you are concerned about radiation, discussing the option of LDCT with your physician could be beneficial.
Balancing Risks and Benefits
The decision to pursue further imaging should be based on a combination of factors, including:
- Your Overall Health: Younger patients often have a better prognosis, and the absence of symptoms or significant findings on previous scans may influence the decision to delay more aggressive imaging.
- Tumor Characteristics: The small size of your tumor and the absence of lymphovascular invasion or pleural invasion are favorable indicators. This may suggest a lower risk of recurrence, allowing for a more conservative follow-up approach.
- Personal Preferences: Your comfort level with the proposed imaging strategy and your concerns about radiation exposure should be openly discussed with your healthcare team. They can help tailor a follow-up plan that aligns with your values and preferences.
Conclusion
In summary, while the proposed imaging strategies are standard for lung cancer follow-up, it is crucial to have an open dialogue with your healthcare provider about your concerns regarding radiation exposure and the necessity of each test. If you feel uncertain about the recommendations or wish for a different perspective, seeking a second opinion can provide additional clarity and reassurance. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that you receive appropriate surveillance for cancer recurrence while minimizing unnecessary risks.
Similar Q&A
Do You Need Follow-Up for Chest X-Ray Findings?
Hello, last month my family member was hospitalized for orthopedic surgery. During the hospitalization, a chest X-ray was performed, and now I see the report in the health record as follows: "Increased lung markings, bilateral with mild peribronchial wall thickening over the...
Dr. Wu Yingxun reply Pulmonology
Hello: According to the report, there are no significant abnormalities, so follow-up can be done once a year.[Read More] Do You Need Follow-Up for Chest X-Ray Findings?
Understanding Lung X-Ray Results: When to Seek Further Medical Advice
I would like to ask the doctor, our school had a chest X-ray last month (to check for pulmonary tuberculosis), and today we received the examination report ------------------------------ Examination Item: Abdominal X-ray (one view) Result: Suspected round opacity in the right upp...
Dr. Zhou Ziguang reply Pulmonology
Hello: The circular artifact on the X-ray may be a foreign object on clothing, but please consult a pulmonologist for confirmation.[Read More] Understanding Lung X-Ray Results: When to Seek Further Medical Advice
Understanding Lung Issues: What to Do About Suspicious Findings
Hello Dr. Jian, A year ago, during a health check-up, I underwent a chest X-ray and a low-dose computed tomography (CT) scan. The report indicated suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (I have not experienced any cough or symptoms). I have been followed up in the outpatient clinic fo...
Dr. Jian Shuntian reply Pulmonology
(1) The three small nodules later connected are likely not tumors; they could be pulmonary tuberculosis. A biopsy and bronchoscopy can be performed. If these two procedures are not done, or if they are done without conclusive results, a trial treatment for tuberculosis can be con...[Read More] Understanding Lung Issues: What to Do About Suspicious Findings
Understanding Lung Nodules: What You Need to Know and Next Steps
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question amidst your busy schedule. I inadvertently participated in a group health check, and the report I received indicates a suspected 2 cm nodule in my lungs. Does this refer to a tumor? Should I return to my original hospital, or sh...
Dr. Xie Weiming reply Internal Medicine
Hello, internet user: There are many causes for pulmonary nodules, which can range from benign or malignant tumors to simply calcifications of the ribs or pleura. It is essential to carefully examine the chest X-ray, and if necessary, perform a computed tomography (CT) scan for b...[Read More] Understanding Lung Nodules: What You Need to Know and Next Steps
Related FAQ
(Pulmonology)
Which Department Should I See?(Pulmonology)
Ct Report(Pulmonology)
Ct Scan(Pulmonology)
Lungs(Pulmonology)
Chest Discomfort(Pulmonology)
Other(Pulmonology)
Lung Nodule(Pulmonology)
Health Examination Report(Pulmonology)
Pulmonary Obstruction(Pulmonology)