Should You Consider a Kidney Biopsy for Unexplained Proteinuria?

Should a kidney biopsy be performed?

Hello, doctor.
I am the patient who previously inquired about "unexplained proteinuria" (I have had persistent protein in my urine for 3-4 years and am currently managing it with Aprovel and Persantin).
Over the past year, during follow-up visits, my proteinuria levels have improved, fluctuating between "normal and +1." The doctor mentioned that it doesn't seem severe enough to warrant a kidney biopsy (and left the decision to me).
However, taking medication has been disruptive to my life, and I am hesitant to stop it without guidance.
Given my situation, would you recommend a biopsy? If I undergo the procedure, will it help identify the underlying cause? Once the cause is determined, is there a greater chance of targeted treatment leading to a cure, or is it more common to continue managing the condition with medication? I have many questions and would appreciate your guidance.
Thank you!

Lin Sir, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2017/01/13

Dr. Wu Hongjie reply Internal Medicine

The following are common reasons for performing a kidney biopsy:
At onset:
1.
Clinical pure proteinuria > 3 grams/day, along with suspicion of other possible lesions within the kidneys.
2.
Nephrotic syndrome occurring outside of childhood (proteinuria > 3 grams/day).
Intermediate:
Persistent proteinuria, and ineffective response to corticosteroids or medications aimed at reducing proteinuria (ineffective response is defined as remaining > 0.3 grams/day after treatment).
Later:
1.
Recurrent nephritic syndrome.
2.
Nephritis unresponsive to corticosteroids.
3.
Clinical progression that differs from the expected disease course.
4.
Rapidly progressive renal function deterioration.
5.
Chronic kidney disease with preserved kidney size.
Based on your situation, if the treatment has resulted in proteinuria < 0.3 grams/day, a biopsy may help identify the cause, but it may not significantly impact the outcome.
Even if a cause is found, if there has been no recovery for more than three months, treatment options are limited, and management will primarily focus on medication control.
Thank you.

Reply Date: 2017/01/13

More Info

When considering whether to undergo a kidney biopsy for unexplained proteinuria, it's essential to weigh the potential benefits and risks of the procedure. Proteinuria, or the presence of excess protein in the urine, can be a sign of kidney damage or disease. In your case, you've been experiencing proteinuria for several years, and while your recent values have shown improvement, the concern remains about the underlying cause.

A kidney biopsy is a procedure that involves taking a small sample of kidney tissue for examination under a microscope. This can help diagnose various kidney conditions, including glomerulonephritis, diabetic nephropathy, and other forms of kidney disease. However, it is generally recommended only when there is a clear indication that the results would significantly impact treatment decisions.

In your situation, the fact that your proteinuria levels have improved and are currently within a range that is not considered severely abnormal (normal to +1) suggests that your condition may not be severe enough to warrant a biopsy at this time. According to guidelines, a kidney biopsy is typically not performed in patients with low-grade proteinuria (less than 500 mg/day or less than 500 mg/g creatinine). Your healthcare provider's recommendation against a biopsy aligns with this practice.

It's also important to consider the risks associated with a kidney biopsy, which can include bleeding, infection, and damage to the kidney. Given that your protein levels are not significantly elevated and that you are currently managing your condition with medication (Aprovel and Persantin), the risks may outweigh the potential benefits of obtaining a biopsy.

In terms of treatment, if the biopsy were to reveal a specific diagnosis, it could potentially lead to targeted therapies that might improve your condition. However, many kidney diseases are managed with medications and lifestyle modifications rather than curative treatments. For example, controlling blood pressure and protein intake, as well as managing any underlying conditions (like diabetes), are critical components of care for patients with kidney issues.

If you are experiencing significant side effects from your current medications or if you feel that your quality of life is being affected, it is crucial to discuss these concerns with your healthcare provider. They may be able to adjust your medication regimen or suggest alternative treatments that could alleviate your symptoms without compromising your kidney health.

In summary, while a kidney biopsy can provide valuable information, it is not always necessary, especially in cases of mild proteinuria. Continuous monitoring of your kidney function and protein levels, along with appropriate medication management, is often the best approach. If your condition changes or worsens, or if you develop new symptoms, it would be prudent to revisit the discussion about a biopsy at that time. Always keep an open line of communication with your healthcare provider to ensure that your treatment plan aligns with your health goals and lifestyle.

Similar Q&A

Should You Consider a Kidney Biopsy for Unexplained Renal Dysfunction?

Hello Dr. Chen, I have been experiencing renal insufficiency for about 4 years now. I have undergone an ultrasound examination, and the kidney size was normal. Currently, I am undergoing regular follow-up checks. My creatinine levels are around 1.7, and my blood urea nitrogen is ...

Dr. Chen Qiunan reply Urology
Hello Pan, based on the information you provided, there are no obvious signs of glomerulonephritis. Generally, kidney diseases can be classified as primary or secondary. Primary kidney diseases mostly refer to primary glomerulonephritis. If there is proteinuria or hematuria, trea...

Understanding Proteinuria: Should You See a Nephrologist?

Hello Doctor, during this year's employee health check, I found (+) urine protein and (+/-) occult blood. I have had similar test results in the past, but after several rechecks, they disappeared. However, I occasionally test positive again, and sometimes my white blood cell...

Dr. Yang Jun reply Internal Medicine
Hello: In response to your question, the presence of proteinuria can be classified into functional proteinuria and pathological proteinuria. Functional proteinuria may occur due to urinary tract infections, fever, infections, or during a woman's menstrual period, and it typi...

Understanding Proteinuria: Health Implications and Specialist Consultation

During a health check-up, I found out that I have protein in my urine, and I am not familiar with "proteinuria." I am unsure of its impact on my health. If I need to seek medical attention, which specialty should I consult?

Dr. Li Junde reply Surgery
Miss Ah-Hui: Your question is answered as follows: Proteinuria is one of the items in a routine urinalysis, which can be assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. Generally, it indicates the amount of protein present in the urine, which should be absent or only in trace amounts ...

Understanding Proteinuria: When to Recheck Your Kidney Health

Hello, doctor. This year, during the second semester of my sophomore year, I was found to have protein in my urine when I entered high school (all other blood and urine tests were normal). Recently, I went to the hospital for testing again (about a year after the last test), and ...

Dr. Li Xinyi reply Urology
It is advisable to see a nephrologist for an examination.