Discovery of pulmonary calcification issues?
A 7-year-old child was found to have a pulmonary calcification (one calcified area) at the end of October 2016.
Follow-up X-rays were taken in November and January, and on January 24, the doctor reviewed the new and old X-rays and reported no changes, but did not indicate whether there was any active disease or the nature of the calcification.
After the discovery of the calcification, sputum was collected in November 2016 (report was normal) and a skin test for tuberculosis was performed (report was negative, normal).
If there have been no changes over these three months, is there a need for a CT scan for further evaluation? The child has a history of severe allergies and asthma, making them a high-risk group for iodinated contrast agents.
What precautions should be taken when administering contrast agents? Is it possible to perform a CT scan without contrast? I would like to know if there is a necessity for a CT scan, or if continued monitoring with X-rays is sufficient? (The child has a history of several hospitalizations for mycoplasma and pneumonia during early childhood.) Thank you, doctor.
Xiao Yin, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2017/03/01
Dr. Yang Wenda reply Pulmonology
Hello: Calcified nodules may be scar tissue resulting from previous inflammation, and their shape and size are unlikely to change significantly.
Since they occupy only a very small portion of the lungs, they will not affect respiratory function.
It is recommended that no further examinations (including X-rays) are necessary at this time.
If there is a need for an X-ray in the future for other reasons, it would be sufficient to observe for any changes then.
Best wishes!
Reply Date: 2017/03/01
More Info
When it comes to evaluating lung calcification in children, particularly in a 7-year-old who has been monitored for a calcified lesion, there are several important considerations to keep in mind. The presence of a calcified nodule in the lungs can often be a benign finding, especially if it has remained stable over time, as indicated by the X-ray results showing no significant changes over the past few months.
In your case, the child has had multiple X-rays, and the physician has noted that there has been no change in the calcified area. This is a positive sign, as stable calcifications are typically not indicative of active disease, such as infection or malignancy. The fact that the sputum analysis and the tuberculin skin test were normal further supports the likelihood that the calcification is not due to an active infectious process.
Regarding the necessity of a CT scan, it is generally recommended when there is uncertainty about the nature of a lung lesion or if there are changes in the clinical picture that warrant further investigation. Since the calcification has not changed and the child has a history of respiratory issues, it may be reasonable to continue monitoring with X-rays unless there are new symptoms or concerns that arise.
However, if the physician believes that a CT scan is warranted, it is important to discuss the potential risks and benefits with them. CT scans provide more detailed images than X-rays and can help clarify the nature of the calcification. In children, especially those with a history of allergies and asthma, the use of contrast agents (iodinated contrast) can pose additional risks, including allergic reactions.
If the child is at high risk for allergic reactions, it may be advisable to perform the CT scan without contrast, as many lung conditions can still be assessed adequately without it. The decision to use contrast should be made collaboratively between the physician and the parents, considering the child's medical history and the specific clinical questions that need to be answered.
In summary, if the calcification has remained stable and there are no new concerning symptoms, continued monitoring with X-rays may be sufficient. However, if there are any doubts or if the physician recommends a CT scan for further evaluation, it is crucial to weigh the risks of using contrast against the potential benefits of obtaining more detailed imaging. Always feel free to ask your healthcare provider about any concerns regarding the procedure, especially in the context of the child's allergies and asthma.
Similar Q&A
Assessing the Need for CT Scans in Pediatric Lung Calcification Cases
A 7-year-old child was found to have a pulmonary calcification (one calcified area) at the end of October 2016. Follow-up X-rays were taken in November and January, with the January 24th X-ray showing no changes compared to previous images, although the doctor did not specify whe...
Dr. Yang Wenda reply Pulmonology
Hello: If you have a history of allergies, you can discuss with your physician the option of not administering contrast agents, unless the physician considers the presence of a vascular tumor or other lesions that may benefit from enhanced imaging with contrast agents, or you may...[Read More] Assessing the Need for CT Scans in Pediatric Lung Calcification Cases
Understanding Pulmonary Fibrosis and Calcium Deposits: When to Seek Help
Pulmonary suspected fibrotic calcification indicates the presence of calcified lesions in the lung tissue, which may suggest previous infections, such as tuberculosis, or other chronic lung conditions. It is important to consult a pulmonologist for further evaluation. They may re...
Dr. Jiang Zhenyuan reply Pulmonology
Suspected pulmonary fibrotic calcification is an opacity observed on a chest X-ray. The physician determines that it is not active and is a remnant of a previous lung disease. It is advisable to consult a pulmonologist for the interpretation of the X-ray to confirm the diagnosis.[Read More] Understanding Pulmonary Fibrosis and Calcium Deposits: When to Seek Help
Understanding Calcifications in the Right Lung: What You Need to Know
Hello Doctor: About two months ago, I underwent a comprehensive health check-up, and the chest X-ray revealed a few small white spots in my right lung. The physician mentioned that these are likely calcifications, possibly scars from past inflammation, but I don't recall hav...
Dr. Jian Shuntian reply Pulmonology
Please bring all relevant information, including the CT scan and chest X-ray, to consult with a pulmonologist.[Read More] Understanding Calcifications in the Right Lung: What You Need to Know
Is CT Scan Radiation Safe for Young Children? Understanding Risks
Hello doctor, my son turned four today. He went to the hospital for an arrangement due to pectus excavatum, and he had an X-ray and a chest CT scan. I only found out afterward that the radiation exposure was quite high. Could this excessive radiation exposure have any effects? I&...
Dr. Yang Jinghua reply Radiology
Dear Xiaoqi's Mom, Thank you for your inquiry. Medical imaging examinations assist clinicians in precise diagnosis and treatment. The amount of ionizing radiation exposure from these diagnostic tests is approximately equivalent to two years of natural background radiation. ...[Read More] Is CT Scan Radiation Safe for Young Children? Understanding Risks
Related FAQ
(Pulmonology)
Ct Scan(Pulmonology)
Ct Report(Pulmonology)
Pediatric Heart(Pediatrics)
Bronchiectasis(Pulmonology)
Ground-Glass Nodule(Pulmonology)
Ct Scan Report(Cardiology)
Ct Scan(Radiology)
Kawasaki Disease(Pediatrics)
Chest Discomfort(Pulmonology)