Concerns After Mole Removal: Should You Get a Biopsy?

Excision of a mole without biopsy?

Hello, recently I had a mole removed for cosmetic reasons at a dermatology clinic.
The procedure was quick, and I didn't consider that it could be something concerning, so I didn't request a biopsy at the time.
The doctor also did not indicate that there was any issue with the mole.
However, I am now feeling a bit worried and think it would have been better to detect any potential problems early.
What can be done in this situation? Is it sufficient to have just the mole removed, or is it necessary to remove another mole to determine if there is a risk of disease?

L, 20~29 year old female. Ask Date: 2017/04/07

Dr. Wu Yuxin reply Dermatology

You should consult your attending physician about this issue, as they are the most familiar with your condition.

Reply Date: 2017/04/07

More Info

When it comes to concerns after mole removal, particularly regarding whether a biopsy is necessary, it's important to understand a few key points about skin lesions and the significance of histopathological examination.

Firstly, if a mole (or nevus) is removed and there were no indications of malignancy during the procedure, it is still prudent to consider the possibility of underlying issues. Moles can sometimes harbor atypical cells or even melanoma, which is a type of skin cancer. If the mole was removed without a prior biopsy, and you are feeling anxious about the possibility of it being cancerous, there are a few steps you can take.

1. Consult Your Dermatologist: The first step is to follow up with the dermatologist who performed the procedure. Discuss your concerns openly. They can provide insights based on their observations during the removal process. If they believe there is a reason for concern, they may recommend a biopsy of the excised tissue if it was not already sent for histopathological analysis.

2. Histopathological Examination: If the mole was completely excised, the best course of action is to have the excised tissue examined by a pathologist. This examination can determine whether any atypical or malignant cells were present. If the tissue was not sent for analysis, you may need to discuss with your dermatologist the possibility of re-excising the area to obtain a sample for testing.

3. Monitoring for Changes: If the mole was removed and there are no immediate concerns, it is still essential to monitor the area for any changes. Look for new growths, changes in color, or any other unusual symptoms in the surrounding skin. If you notice anything concerning, return to your dermatologist for evaluation.

4. Understanding the Need for Further Excision: If the initial mole was not adequately assessed and there is a suspicion of malignancy, further excision may be necessary. This is particularly true if the margins of the excised mole were not clear, meaning that some of the mole may still be present in the skin. Clear margins are crucial to ensure that all potentially cancerous cells have been removed.

5. Emotional and Psychological Considerations: It's natural to feel anxious about the possibility of skin cancer, especially if you have concerns about the mole that was removed. Engaging in open conversations with your healthcare provider can help alleviate some of this anxiety. They can provide reassurance and guidance on the next steps.

6. Preventive Measures: Moving forward, it’s essential to practice sun safety and regular skin checks. Protecting your skin from UV radiation and being vigilant about changes in your skin can help catch any potential issues early.

In summary, if you have concerns about a mole that was removed without a biopsy, it is advisable to consult with your dermatologist. They can assess whether further action is needed, including a histopathological examination of the excised tissue. Early detection is key in managing skin cancer, so being proactive about your health is crucial.

Similar Q&A

Facial Mole Removal: Will a Biopsy Leave Scars?

Will there be a scar after the biopsy? Since it's on the face, there absolutely cannot be any scars. Should I see a dermatologist or a cosmetic medicine specialist for the biopsy?

Dr. Wu Yuxin reply Dermatology
Every step leaves a trace, whether it is obvious or not. If necessary, you can seek assistance from an orthopedic surgeon.

Understanding Moles and Birthmarks: Post-Removal Concerns and Pathology Options

Hello, Doctor: I would like to ask you about a recent experience I had at the hospital where I underwent electrosurgery to remove moles. For some of the larger moles, the doctor sent samples for dermatopathological examination, and the results were all benign. However, for some m...

Dr. Wu Yuxin reply Dermatology
If you want to confirm, you should have chosen surgery from the beginning. If there are remnants after electrocautery, then it would be possible to excise them again for pathological examination.

Consulting for Mole Removal: Dermatology vs. Plastic Surgery

I have a raised mole on my back about the size of a red bean. The surface and surrounding area are not very regular, and it feels a bit soft and watery to the touch. I would like to ask: 1. Which department should I visit, dermatology or plastic surgery? 2. If the doctor determin...

Dr. Lu Daokuan reply Plastic Surgery
Soft moles on the back usually do not show any changes and have likely been present for many years. If there are symptoms such as irregular pigmentation, bleeding, or oozing, a biopsy is recommended. It may not be possible to schedule the excision on the same day, so it's be...

Understanding Changes in Moles: When to Seek Dermatological Advice

Thank you, doctor, for taking the time to respond. About three months ago, I noticed that a mole on my left forearm seemed to have developed a "foot," with changes in shape and a brown color. It is flat, not painful or itchy, and although it is approximately 0.4 cm in s...

Dr. Wu Yuxin reply Dermatology
To determine whether a mole has undergone any pathological changes, a biopsy is necessary for a definitive diagnosis. If there are no changes in the short term, it is reasonable to monitor it; however, if there are significant changes, a biopsy should still be considered.