Cardiac examination
Doctor: Hello! Recently, I experienced occasional chest tightness and chest pain, so I underwent an exercise electrocardiogram (ECG).
The report indicated downsloping ST depression >= -2.15 mm over aVF at exercise stage 4 (Max HR: 155 (96%), Max time: 10’07”).
It was strongly positive.
Later, I had a nuclear medicine myocardial perfusion scan, which suggested myocardial ischemia and right coronary artery obstruction.
The report stated: 1.
No abnormal lung uptake.
2.
Normal left ventricular size.
3.
Mild reversible defect in the inferior walls (30% decrease).
4.
Extent: stress 0%, redistribution 0%; TPD: stress 0%, redistribution 0%; SSS 0, SRS 0, SDS 0.
Impression: Diaphragm attenuation effect in inferior walls is first considered.
Differential Diagnosis: mild myocardial ischemia.
However, I have undergone multiple exercise ECGs and nuclear medicine myocardial perfusion scans over the past 15 years, with exercise ECGs sometimes being negative and sometimes positive, and the nuclear medicine scans showing similar results to this report, ultimately adding that a normal variant is more likely.
Follow-up on this study is recommended.
Cardiac examination timeline:
- Exercise ECG:
- 90.04.30: Positive
- 90.04.30: Small persistent defects in midline of anterior and inferior walls (30% decrease)
- 91.01.24: Negative
- 91.12.11: Negative
- 91.12.11: Reveal persistent defects in midline of anterior and inferior walls (30% decrease)
- 92.12.08: Positive
- 92.12.08: Reversible defect in basal anterior and inferior walls (30% decrease)
- 94.11.17: Negative
- 104.06.08: Preexisting ST-T changes preclude meaningful interpretation (exercise ECG)
- 105.11.21: Strongly positive
- 105.12.14: Reversible defect in inferior walls (30% decrease)
I have two questions:
1.
If there is indeed myocardial ischemia, why has the percentage of decrease not increased over the past 15 years, remaining at 30%?
2.
The doctor suggested a coronary angiogram, which is invasive, and I have a family member who passed away due to complications from balloon angioplasty, so I am hesitant to proceed.
Would a CT scan provide more accuracy than a nuclear medicine myocardial perfusion scan?
I apologize for taking up so much of your time, and I appreciate your help!
Mr. Huang, 60~69 year old female. Ask Date: 2017/04/10
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, over the past 15 years, I have undergone multiple exercise electrocardiograms and nuclear medicine myocardial perfusion studies, with reports being relatively consistent.
However, I am still concerned about the possibility of coronary artery disease.
I recommend undergoing a computed tomography angiography to get a clearer view.
Changhua Hospital cares about your health.
Reply Date: 2017/04/10
More Info
Understanding heart checkups, particularly in the context of ischemia and diagnostic options, is crucial for managing cardiovascular health. Your case presents a complex history of chest discomfort, exercise stress tests, and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) that raises important questions about the nature of your heart condition and the best approach for further evaluation.
1. Ischemia and Its Stability Over Time
You mentioned that over the past 15 years, your MPI results have shown varying degrees of ischemia, with a consistent 30% decrease in perfusion noted in the inferior walls. The question arises: if ischemia has been present for so long, why hasn't there been a significant increase in the severity of the condition?
This stability can be attributed to several factors:
- Chronic Ischemia: Some patients can have chronic ischemia without significant progression. This may be due to collateral circulation, where other blood vessels compensate for the reduced blood flow in the affected coronary artery.
- Lifestyle Factors: If you have maintained a healthy lifestyle, including diet and exercise, this could help stabilize your condition. Conversely, if there have been risk factors like smoking or uncontrolled diabetes, these could exacerbate ischemia over time.
- Diagnostic Variability: The nature of diagnostic tests can lead to variability in results. Factors such as the patient's condition on the day of the test, the technician's skill, and even the equipment used can influence outcomes.
2. Invasive vs. Non-Invasive Testing
Regarding your concern about undergoing a coronary angiogram (heart catheterization), it's understandable given your family history. This procedure is indeed invasive and carries risks, but it is often considered the gold standard for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). It provides direct visualization of the coronary arteries and can identify blockages that other tests may not detect.
However, non-invasive tests like cardiac MRI or CT angiography can offer valuable insights without the risks associated with catheterization. These imaging modalities can provide detailed information about the heart's structure and function, as well as the status of the coronary arteries.
- Cardiac MRI: This test can assess myocardial perfusion and viability, providing a comprehensive view of heart function without radiation exposure.
- CT Angiography: This is a less invasive option that can visualize coronary arteries and assess for blockages. It has a high sensitivity for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis.
3. Follow-Up Recommendations
Given your history of fluctuating results and concerns about invasive procedures, it may be beneficial to discuss the following with your cardiologist:
- Regular Monitoring: Continue with regular follow-ups and non-invasive testing to monitor your heart's condition. This can help track any changes over time without immediate invasive intervention.
- Risk Factor Management: Focus on controlling any modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and lifestyle choices. This can significantly impact your overall cardiovascular health.
- Second Opinion: If you're uncertain about the recommendations for invasive testing, seeking a second opinion from another cardiologist can provide additional perspectives and reassurance.
Conclusion
In summary, your situation highlights the importance of understanding the nuances of heart disease diagnosis and management. While ischemia can be a serious condition, its stability over time and the availability of advanced non-invasive imaging techniques can provide alternatives to invasive procedures. Engaging in open discussions with your healthcare provider about your concerns and preferences is essential for making informed decisions about your heart health.
Similar Q&A
Understanding Myocardial Ischemia: Insights from ECG and Echocardiogram Results
Hello Doctor, I have noticed significant differences in the test results from a clinic and a large hospital, and I hope you can assist in interpreting them. Thank you! [Clinic A] 1. 24-Hour Holter Monitor: - 402.10 HYPERTENSIVE HEART DISEASE, BENIGN WITHOUT CONGESTIVE...
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, I trust large hospitals. I cannot make a judgment without seeing the relevant images, but I believe it is better to observe first. Changhua Hospital cares about you.[Read More] Understanding Myocardial Ischemia: Insights from ECG and Echocardiogram Results
Understanding Your Heart: Insights on ECG, Holter Monitoring, and Exercise Tests
Hello, Doctor. After staying up late for three consecutive nights at the beginning of November 2021, I started experiencing a tight feeling in my heart that occurs intermittently throughout the day. I visited the hospital where the doctor performed an electrocardiogram (ECG), a 2...
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, you have no risk factors, and the probability is indeed low. However, a positive exercise electrocardiogram may be a false positive due to variations in your baseline ECG. You should be fine, so don't worry. If you still feel uneasy, you can consider getting a CT scan...[Read More] Understanding Your Heart: Insights on ECG, Holter Monitoring, and Exercise Tests
Understanding Heart Health: Key Questions About Your Cardiovascular Checkup
Hello, Doctor. I have a few questions to ask. During a recent mountain climbing trip, I felt unwell, and the tour guide noticed that my blood oxygen level was low and my heart rate was high, suggesting that I go to the hospital for an examination. The results of the examination a...
Dr. Wu Xueming reply Cardiology
1. Chest pain can be classified as cardiac or non-cardiac. Cardiac chest pain, commonly known as angina, typically has the following characteristics: 1. It lasts for several minutes (2-10 minutes), is described as pressure-like, and may cause shortness of breath (like an elephant...[Read More] Understanding Heart Health: Key Questions About Your Cardiovascular Checkup
Understanding Myocardial Hypoxia: Questions and Insights for Patients
Hello, doctor. I previously visited a cardiologist due to chest tightness and palpitations. During a resting electrocardiogram (ECG), arrhythmia was detected, leading to a 24-hour Holter monitor test. The results indicated that the arrhythmia was within normal limits, but there w...
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, a 24-hour ECG showing ST-T changes does not necessarily indicate myocardial ischemia, so it is reasonable to observe first. Therefore, the physician did not arrange for further testing. If you are still concerned, you may consider undergoing a stress test and blood tests f...[Read More] Understanding Myocardial Hypoxia: Questions and Insights for Patients
Related FAQ
(Cardiology)
Heartbeat(Cardiology)
Angina(Cardiology)
Afib(Cardiology)
Electrocardiogram(Cardiology)
Health Check-Up Report(Cardiology)
Chf(Cardiology)
Pulse(Cardiology)
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging(Cardiology)
Cardiac Catheterization(Cardiology)