Is Penetrating Bone Screws a Standard Treatment for L5-S1 Issues? - Neurosurgery

Share to:

Lumbar vertebral screw penetration?


I have a L5-S1 vertebral arch dissociation, but the intervertebral disc is normal, and I have osteoporosis with a T-score of -2.6.
After a medical diagnosis, the doctor performed a minimally invasive cortical bone screw fixation at L5-S1.
Post-surgery, the doctor informed me that to achieve a better fixation effect, four screws were intentionally inserted to protrude approximately 0.7 cm to 1 cm beyond the vertebrae.
After discharge, I experienced significant soreness and weakness in my lower back and buttocks, with no signs of improvement.
Is it standard practice for bone screws to protrude beyond the vertebrae?

Zhang Jiaxiong, 60~69 year old female. Ask Date: 2019/06/08

Dr. Lai Zhaokang reply Neurosurgery


Hello: 1.
It is true that some physicians may consider the patient's condition or their medical habits, which could lead to the screws penetrating the vertebrae.
2.
Your postoperative symptoms may not necessarily be related to the screws penetrating the vertebrae.
3.
We have not seen your preoperative and postoperative imaging, so we cannot fully assess your condition.
4.
If you have postoperative concerns, you should first consult the original surgeon.
If you still have doubts, please bring your preoperative and postoperative images and consult another specialist.
Best wishes.
// Dr.
Lai Chao-Kang, Chief of Spine Neurosurgery, Changhua Hospital.

Reply Date: 2019/06/08

More Info


Penetrating bone screws, particularly in the context of L5-S1 issues, can be a part of a surgical strategy aimed at stabilizing the spine, especially in cases where traditional methods may not provide adequate support. However, the use of such screws and the specific technique employed can vary significantly based on the individual patient's condition, the surgeon's expertise, and the overall treatment plan.

In your case, it appears that you have been diagnosed with a L5-S1 spondylolysis, which is a defect in the bony arch of the vertebra that can lead to instability. The fact that your intervertebral disc is normal is a positive aspect, as it suggests that the disc is not contributing to your symptoms. However, the presence of osteoporosis (-2.6 T-score) complicates the situation, as it can affect bone quality and healing.

The use of penetrating screws to achieve fixation in the L5-S1 region is not uncommon, especially in minimally invasive spine surgery. The goal of this approach is to provide stability to the affected segment of the spine while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues. The screws are designed to anchor into the vertebrae and provide a solid foundation for the spine to heal. However, the technique of deliberately penetrating the vertebrae by 0.7cm to 1cm raises some questions regarding the appropriateness of this method, particularly in light of your reported symptoms of severe pain and weakness in the lower back and buttocks post-surgery.

It is essential to understand that while penetrating screws can be effective, they also carry risks, including the potential for nerve injury, infection, and inadequate fixation leading to persistent pain. The pain and weakness you are experiencing could be due to several factors, including surgical trauma, inflammation, or even complications related to the screws themselves. It is crucial to communicate these symptoms to your surgeon, as they may indicate that further evaluation is needed to determine the cause of your discomfort.

In terms of standard treatment protocols, the use of penetrating screws is typically guided by the specific clinical scenario and the surgeon's judgment. While it may be a recognized technique in certain cases, it is not universally applicable to all patients with L5-S1 issues. Therefore, it is vital to have a thorough discussion with your orthopedic or spinal surgeon regarding the rationale behind the chosen surgical approach, the expected outcomes, and the management of your postoperative symptoms.

If your symptoms persist or worsen, seeking a second opinion from another spine specialist may be beneficial. They can provide additional insights into your condition and the appropriateness of the surgical technique used. Additionally, they may recommend further imaging studies, such as an MRI or CT scan, to assess the integrity of the screws and the surrounding structures.

In summary, while penetrating bone screws can be a part of the treatment for L5-S1 issues, their use must be carefully considered in the context of the individual patient's condition and overall treatment plan. Your ongoing symptoms warrant further investigation and discussion with your healthcare provider to ensure that you receive the most appropriate care moving forward.

Similar Q&A

Understanding Tibial Fractures: Complications and Treatment Options

Hello Doctor: My brother is a patient with a closed fracture of the upper end of the right tibia and has undergone internal fixation surgery with bone screws. One and a half months after discharge, he was diagnosed with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of the tibia and was readmi...


Dr. Chen Yongxue reply Orthopedics
1. Is it more suitable for the original surgeon who initially placed the artificial plates and screws to perform the removal and debridement surgery, or is it acceptable for a surgeon from another hospital to do it? What are the pros and cons of each? Having the original surgeon ...

[Read More] Understanding Tibial Fractures: Complications and Treatment Options


Understanding Calcaneal Fracture Fixation: Plate and Screw Considerations

Hello Dr. Lee, I would like to ask you some questions regarding the use of plates for fixation in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. First, as far as I know, there are traditional Y-shaped plates and the self-funded Aplus anatomical plates for calcaneal fixation. I would like ...


Dr. Li Yongheng reply Orthopedics
1. The traditional Y-shaped plate has screw holes that are not threaded. The self-funded A Plus anatomical plate allows for fewer bone screws to be used in fixation compared to the traditional Y-shaped plate, and the types of bone screws used for both plates are different. 2. T...

[Read More] Understanding Calcaneal Fracture Fixation: Plate and Screw Considerations


Should You Remove Titanium Screws After Fifth Metatarsal Fracture?

The recommendation for removal is based on the fact that the patient would have to live with the bone screws and plates for the next 50-60 years, which could introduce additional uncertainties. Since the lower extremities bear significant weight, there is a possibility of develop...


Dr. Shi Guozheng reply Orthopedics
1. It is possible. 2. There is no increased risk of fractures because continued walking makes it less likely to develop osteoporosis. There may be temporary cavities, but over time, the bone will regenerate and fill in. 3. Removing it requires another surgery, which carries its o...

[Read More] Should You Remove Titanium Screws After Fifth Metatarsal Fracture?


Understanding Lisfranc Fractures: Recovery, Treatment Options, and Foot Strengthening

Dear Dr. Shih, On November 2, 2016, I experienced pain in my left foot after colliding with a stone pillar while riding a bike. An orthopedic surgeon diagnosed me with fractures of the first and second metatarsal bones and a ligament tear, specifically a Lisfranc fracture. The f...


Dr. Shi Guozheng reply Orthopedics
This type of fracture may not fully recover after surgery for the displacement of nearby joints, but the use of foot pads and rehabilitation may improve some aspects.

[Read More] Understanding Lisfranc Fractures: Recovery, Treatment Options, and Foot Strengthening


Related FAQ

Coccyx

(Neurosurgery)

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

(Neurosurgery)

Feet

(Neurosurgery)

Persistent Headache

(Surgery)

Thumb

(Neurosurgery)

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

(Neurosurgery)

Medical Consultation

(Neurosurgery)

Meningitis

(Neurosurgery)

Posterior Head

(Neurosurgery)

Headache

(Neurosurgery)