Radiation Exposure: Risks and Measurements in Medical Procedures - Radiology

Share to:

Radiation dose


The radiation dose from cardiac catheterization with ablation in 2012 varies based on the specific procedure and equipment used, but it typically ranges from 5 to 30 millisieverts (mSv).
The radiation dose for a neck and head CT scan in the same year is generally around 2 to 4 mSv for the neck and approximately 2 to 3 mSv for a head CT.
Cumulative radiation exposure over 10 to 20 years could potentially increase the risk of developing radiation-induced conditions, but the actual risk depends on various factors, including the total dose received and individual susceptibility.
Regarding the two chest X-rays performed in the last six months, the radiation dose from a chest X-ray is usually about 0.1 mSv.
The risk of developing radiation-induced conditions from such low doses is considered very low.
To convert 200 grays (Gy) to millisieverts (mSv), it is important to note that 1 Gy is equivalent to 1,000 mSv when considering the same tissue type.
Therefore, 200 Gy equals 200,000 mSv.
However, this conversion is typically relevant for high doses of radiation and may not apply in the same way for diagnostic imaging.

Xiao Bi, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2019/06/09

Dr. Ye Weicheng reply Radiology


Ans1: Cardiac catheterization is a procedure that involves fluoroscopic imaging, and the radiation dose does not have a fixed value; it depends on the duration of radiation exposure at the time.
Typically, the dose ranges from 7 to 15 millisieverts, but if the physician's proficiency is insufficient or if the case is complex, the received dose may be higher.
Ans2: The radiation dose from a computed tomography (CT) scan is influenced by the length of the scan and the conditions set for imaging, which may vary based on the interpreting physician's preferences at different hospitals.
Generally, the dose for a routine head CT is about 2 to 4 millisieverts, while the dose for the neck is relatively lower due to the lower tissue density compared to the head (skull) and its shorter length, thus it does not exceed the head dose.
Ans3: The risks of radiation exposure can be categorized into stochastic effects and deterministic effects.
Deterministic effects occur when the radiation dose reaches a certain threshold, resulting in inevitable harm; however, the radiation used in diagnostic radiology typically does not reach levels that would cause deterministic effects.
Stochastic effects, on the other hand, imply that regardless of the exposure dose, there is a potential risk of developing health issues, with higher absorbed doses correlating to a greater probability of occurrence.
In the next 10 to 20 years, the risk of disease should not be solely attributed to radiation exposure but should also consider environmental pollution comprehensively.
The radiation used in medical settings is necessary, and its benefits outweigh the risks.
The doses are also regulated by the Atomic Energy Commission, so there is no need for excessive concern.
Ans4: The dose from a single chest X-ray varies based on body size, approximately ranging from 0.02 to 0.06 millisieverts.
The annual background radiation in Taiwan is about 2.4 millisieverts, which is equivalent to the dose from more than 100 chest X-rays compared to the background radiation in Taiwan.
Ans5: Gray (Gy) is a measure of radiation exposure, and to convert it to sieverts (Sv) for human absorbed dose, one must multiply by the tissue weighting factor.
The total tissue weighting factor for all organs in the body sums to 1.
Therefore, for whole-body exposure, it would be 200 Gy * 1 = 200 Sv (1 Sv = 1000 mSv).
For exposure to a single organ, the corresponding organ's weighting factor would be applied.
A whole-body dose of 4 Gy would reach a lethal dose, and it is hoped that the question posed by the young lady was hypothetical.

Reply Date: 2019/06/09

More Info


Understanding radiation exposure, especially in the context of medical procedures, is crucial for both patients and healthcare professionals. The concerns regarding cumulative radiation doses and their potential long-term effects are valid and warrant careful consideration.


Radiation Doses from Medical Procedures
1. Cardiac Catheterization: The radiation dose associated with cardiac catheterization, which often involves fluoroscopy, typically ranges from 7 to 15 millisieverts (mSv). The exact dose can vary based on the complexity of the procedure and the duration of fluoroscopy. In cases where the physician is less experienced or if the procedure is particularly complicated, the dose may be higher.

2. CT Scans: For CT scans of the neck and head, the radiation doses can vary significantly based on the specific protocols used by different medical facilities. Generally, a head CT scan can deliver a dose of about 2 to 4 mSv, while a neck CT scan may deliver a similar or slightly lower dose due to the lower density of the tissues involved.

3. Cumulative Radiation Exposure: When considering the cumulative effect of these procedures over a span of 10 to 20 years, it is important to note that while there is a theoretical risk of radiation-induced cancer, the actual risk is relatively low for the doses typically encountered in medical imaging. The risk of developing cancer increases with higher cumulative doses, but the increase in risk from medical imaging is often small compared to other lifestyle factors such as smoking, obesity, and environmental exposures.

4. Chest X-rays: A standard chest X-ray typically delivers a dose of about 0.02 to 0.06 mSv. Given that the average background radiation exposure in Taiwan is approximately 2.4 mSv per year, the radiation from two chest X-rays is minimal in comparison to the background radiation one receives annually.


Understanding Gray and Sievert
Regarding the conversion of gray (Gy) to sievert (Sv), it is essential to understand that gray measures the absorbed dose of radiation, while sievert accounts for the biological effect of that radiation on human tissue. The conversion factor depends on the type of radiation and the tissue being irradiated. For whole-body exposure, 1 Gy is equivalent to 1 Sv, but for specific organs, the conversion may vary due to different tissue sensitivities. Therefore, 200 Gy would be an extraordinarily high and lethal dose, as it far exceeds the threshold for human survival.


Long-term Risks and Considerations
The concern about long-term risks associated with cumulative radiation exposure is valid, but it is essential to contextualize these risks. The additional cancer risk from medical imaging is often compared to the odds of winning a small lottery prize; while there is a risk, it is relatively small and should not overshadow the benefits of necessary medical imaging.
Patients should engage in open discussions with their healthcare providers about the necessity of imaging procedures, weighing the benefits against the risks. It is crucial not to avoid necessary medical evaluations due to fear of radiation, as this could lead to missed diagnoses and treatment opportunities.


Conclusion
In summary, while there is a cumulative effect of radiation exposure from medical procedures, the risks associated with typical diagnostic imaging are generally low compared to the potential benefits. Patients should maintain a dialogue with their healthcare providers to ensure that any imaging performed is justified and necessary, and they should be informed about the radiation doses involved. Understanding these aspects can help alleviate anxiety and promote informed decision-making regarding medical care.

Similar Q&A

Understanding Radiation Exposure: Concerns After Medical Imaging Procedures

Hello Doctor: I would like to ask you a few questions that have been troubling me for a long time and causing me concern. I appreciate your clarification on the following situations: In mid-July, I underwent coronary angiography (with contrast agent) with a dose of 1166, approx...


Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) report 103, doses below 100 millisieverts (including single or multiple exposures) do not cause clinically significant functional impairment. The radiation examinations you mentioned will not excee...

[Read More] Understanding Radiation Exposure: Concerns After Medical Imaging Procedures


Is Your Medical Radiation Exposure Safe? Understanding Dosage Limits and Risks

Hello, I would like to ask about my total annual medical radiation exposure, which was 21 millisieverts in 2022. In August 2023, I underwent a dopamine scan, and today I had a CT scan of my head and neck. I would like to know if the 100 millisieverts limit refers to a yearly expo...


Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, the necessity of X-ray radiation examinations is considered without limiting the radiation dose or the number of examinations. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) report 103, doses below 100 millisieverts (including single or multipl...

[Read More] Is Your Medical Radiation Exposure Safe? Understanding Dosage Limits and Risks


Understanding CT Scan Radiation: Safety Concerns and Accumulation Explained

Hello, doctor. 1. I would like to ask if the radiation exposure from a CT scan accumulates in the body. I am scheduled for a head CT scan soon (which requires contrast dye). 2. I had an abdominal CT scan last October (also with contrast dye), and my health insurance app shows...


Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, radiation is a form of energy that results in exposure during examinations, but it does not accumulate in the human body after the procedure. This is similar to how sunlight does not accumulate in the body after sun exposure. It is important to be aware of the effects of r...

[Read More] Understanding CT Scan Radiation: Safety Concerns and Accumulation Explained


Assessing Radiation Exposure from Recent Medical Imaging Procedures

During a health check-up, a shadow was found in the lungs. In mid-February, follow-up X-rays (both frontal and lateral views) were taken, along with a non-contrast CT scan of the lungs (which took about 20 to 30 minutes). At the end of February, a contrast-enhanced chest CT was p...


Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
1. According to the American Society of Radiologic Technologists, the radiation dose from a frontal and lateral X-ray is approximately 0.1 millisieverts, while two chest CT scans can amount to about 14 millisieverts, a full-body PET scan delivers around 14.1 millisieverts, and an...

[Read More] Assessing Radiation Exposure from Recent Medical Imaging Procedures


Related FAQ

Radiation

(Radiology)

Radiation

(Nuclear Medicine)

Radiological Examination

(Radiology)

Mri Report

(Radiology)

Radiation

(Obstetrics and Gynecology)

Radiation

(Oncology)

Contrast Agent

(Radiology)

Iodine-131

(Nuclear Medicine)

Computed Tomography

(Pulmonology)

Atrial Fibrillation

(Cardiology)