Submucosal tumor of the appendix?
Doctor, I recently underwent a colonoscopy and a tumor approximately 2 cm in size was found in the cecum.
At that time, only a biopsy was performed, and the tumor was not removed because the doctor believed that the wall of the cecum was too thin, and removal would pose a risk.
The biopsy results were benign, but since the doctor could not confirm whether there were any abnormalities in the submucosa, a CT scan was recommended for further evaluation, and I was subsequently referred to a colorectal surgeon.
The surgeon's plan is to remove the right colon, as there is concern that if only the cecum is removed and the pathology results show malignancy, a second surgery would be necessary.
Is this approach standard practice in the medical community? After all, is it reasonable to perform such a significant organ resection for a tumor that is possibly benign? Additionally, why can't the doctor use techniques like Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) to address this tumor?
Flack, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2020/03/04
Dr. Yu Mingchang reply Surgery
Hello; it is possible to first perform an appendectomy and send the tissue for frozen section examination during the surgery.
If acute appendicitis is confirmed, then a colectomy may be considered.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare Changhua Hospital cares about you.
Reply Date: 2020/03/04
More Info
Understanding appendiceal submucosal tumors, particularly in the context of surgical approaches and considerations, is crucial for both patients and healthcare providers. When a submucosal tumor is identified in the appendix, as in your case, the management strategy can vary significantly based on several factors, including the tumor's characteristics, the patient's overall health, and the potential risks associated with surgical interventions.
In your situation, the initial approach involved performing a biopsy during a colonoscopy, which is a common practice when a suspicious lesion is found. The decision to only take a biopsy rather than excising the tumor immediately was likely influenced by the concern about the thinness of the appendiceal wall, which can increase the risk of complications such as perforation or significant bleeding during a more extensive surgical procedure.
The biopsy results indicating a benign tumor are reassuring, but as you noted, the inability to confirm whether there are any abnormalities in the submucosal layer necessitates further investigation. This is where imaging studies, such as a CT scan, come into play. They can provide additional information about the tumor's size, location, and any potential involvement of surrounding structures, which is essential for planning further management.
Regarding the recommendation for right hemicolectomy (removal of the right side of the colon), this approach is indeed a standard consideration in cases where there is uncertainty about the nature of the tumor, especially if there is a risk of malignancy. The rationale behind this recommendation is to ensure complete removal of the tumor and to avoid the need for a second surgery if the tumor were to be found malignant upon further evaluation. While it may seem excessive to remove a significant portion of the colon for a tumor that is currently classified as benign, the potential risks of leaving a malignant tumor untreated often outweigh the risks associated with a more extensive surgical procedure.
As for the use of endoscopic techniques such as Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), these methods are typically reserved for lesions that are confined to the mucosal layer and are accessible for endoscopic removal. Submucosal tumors, however, can be more challenging to manage endoscopically due to their depth of invasion and potential for complications. In cases where the tumor is suspected to be submucosal, surgical resection is often preferred to ensure complete removal and accurate pathological assessment.
In summary, the approach taken in your case aligns with standard medical practices when dealing with appendiceal submucosal tumors. The decision to perform a right hemicolectomy, while seemingly aggressive, is a precautionary measure to ensure comprehensive treatment and minimize the risk of future complications. It is essential to have thorough discussions with your healthcare team about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical interventions, as well as any alternative approaches that may be available. Always feel empowered to seek a second opinion if you have concerns about the recommended treatment plan.
Similar Q&A
Understanding Appendiceal Tumors: Are They Usually Benign?
I have a friend who recently experienced fever and pain in the lower right abdomen, so they went to the hospital for an X-ray, which revealed a dark spot. The doctor said it was a tumor and scheduled surgery. This tumor is located at the tip of the cecum and is approximately 3 ce...
Dr. Chen Sirong reply Oncology
Hello: 1. Everything must rely on the pathology report to be 100% accurate. 2. You should ask the physician if everything has been completely excised. 3. It is not possible to determine whether it is benign or malignant based solely on your description; please consult your attend...[Read More] Understanding Appendiceal Tumors: Are They Usually Benign?
Managing Acute Appendicitis with Abscess: Surgical Considerations and Risks
Hello Doctor, I was hospitalized at the end of August due to acute appendicitis. At that time, the appendix had already perforated and was complicated by an abscess with severe adhesions, so the surgeon was unable to remove the appendix during the operation. I was treated with a ...
Dr. Chen Jiaming reply Surgery
This clinical issue (the likelihood of converting to traditional open surgery) is related to the individual's actual medical condition (as assessed by imaging), so it cannot be answered through online consultation. It is recommended to discuss the new CT scan images further ...[Read More] Managing Acute Appendicitis with Abscess: Surgical Considerations and Risks
Understanding Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Differences, Treatment, and Prognosis
Hello Doctor, I recently underwent a comprehensive health check-up at Cheng Kung University Hospital, and during an endoscopic rectal examination, a tumor was discovered. After two outpatient surgeries for biopsy, I was diagnosed with a rectal carcinoid tumor, and I was hospitali...
Dr. Yang Peizhen reply Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Hello! I apologize for the delayed response to your question. As an internist, I need to consult some resources to address surgical issues. Rectal carcinoids differ histologically from the more commonly referred rectal adenocarcinomas, and they also have different degrees of mali...[Read More] Understanding Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Differences, Treatment, and Prognosis
Understanding Duodenal Submucosal Tumors: Cysts vs. Tumors and Cancer Risks
Hello doctor, I apologize for bothering you again. Regarding the previous question, the report for the gastrointestinal issue (154999) shows abnormal results: a submucosal tumor (5mm) in the duodenum, suspected to be a cyst on the posterior wall of the bulb. Why does the report r...
Dr. Chen Shidian reply Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Duodenal cancer is very rare and is completely different from gastric cancer. Any other concerns can be discussed further with the examining physician; he was merely documenting the subtle changes he observed, which may have caused you some alarm.[Read More] Understanding Duodenal Submucosal Tumors: Cysts vs. Tumors and Cancer Risks
Related FAQ
(Surgery)
Acute Appendicitis(Surgery)
Abdominal Mass(Surgery)
Post-Appendectomy(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Anal Lump(Surgery)
Rectal Carcinoid(Surgery)
Navel(Surgery)
Spleen(Surgery)
Ibs(Surgery)
Hemangioma(Surgery)