Effectiveness of Repeat Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones - Urology

Share to:

Second extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?


Hello, Doctor: I have a stone in the upper ureter near the kidney.
I underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) last week, but the follow-up X-ray results seem to show little change.
The doctor suggested performing ureteroscopy for stone removal, but also mentioned that since it is close to the kidney, the stone might migrate back to the kidney.
I would like to ask if there is any effectiveness in undergoing another session of ESWL if the first one did not show significant results?

Masashi, 40~49 year old female. Ask Date: 2020/04/15

Dr. Du Shixi reply Urology


Hello: The energy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is limited, and some larger stones cannot be effectively treated.
Ureteroscopy for stone removal requires anesthesia and usually necessitates hospitalization.
This procedure uses an endoscope to break the stones into fragments that can be extracted or passed.
Postoperatively, a double-J stent may be placed to maintain urinary tract patency, which can be removed in a few days or weeks during an outpatient visit.
During stone management, due to the need for irrigation, fragments may be flushed back into the kidney, making simultaneous treatment impossible.
As this is an invasive procedure, there are associated risks.
For a second lithotripsy, health insurance regulations require a one-month interval unless there are special circumstances.
It is also possible to consider that if the second procedure does not completely fragment the stones, another endoscopic surgery may be necessary.
Wishing you good health.

Reply Date: 2020/04/15

More Info


Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-invasive procedure commonly used to treat kidney and ureteral stones. It employs shock waves to break down stones into smaller fragments that can be passed through the urinary tract. However, the effectiveness of ESWL can vary based on several factors, including the size, location, and composition of the stone, as well as the patient's anatomy and overall health.

In your case, where a ureteral stone located near the kidney has not shown significant change after the first ESWL session, it is understandable to question the potential effectiveness of a second treatment. Generally, if the first ESWL did not result in substantial fragmentation or movement of the stone, a second session may not guarantee better results. The energy delivered during ESWL is finite, and larger or denser stones may resist fragmentation.
Moreover, the proximity of the stone to the kidney raises concerns. As your doctor mentioned, there is a risk that fragments could migrate back into the kidney during the procedure, complicating the situation further. This is particularly relevant for stones located in the upper ureter, as they are more likely to be influenced by the dynamics of renal drainage and the anatomical changes during the procedure.

If the stone is relatively small (typically less than 2 cm), there may still be a chance for successful fragmentation with a second ESWL session. However, if the stone is larger or has a composition that is less amenable to shock wave treatment (such as cystine or certain types of calcium stones), the likelihood of success diminishes.
In cases where ESWL is deemed ineffective, alternative treatments such as ureteroscopy may be recommended. Ureteroscopy involves the use of a thin tube with a camera to directly visualize and treat the stone, either by fragmentation or retrieval. This method is often more effective for stones that are resistant to ESWL, especially if they are located in challenging anatomical positions.

In terms of accelerating the passage of stones after ESWL, hydration is crucial. Drinking plenty of fluids helps to flush out the urinary system and can facilitate the passage of stone fragments. Additionally, medications such as alpha-blockers may be prescribed to help relax the ureter and promote stone passage.

In summary, while a second ESWL session may be considered, its effectiveness is uncertain, especially if the first treatment did not yield significant results. Discussing the potential risks and benefits with your healthcare provider is essential, as they can provide personalized recommendations based on your specific situation. If the stone remains problematic, exploring alternative treatment options may be necessary to ensure effective management and prevent complications such as hydronephrosis or recurrent urinary tract infections.

Similar Q&A

Managing Kidney Stones: Effective Treatments and Options for Relief

Hello, Doctor! I would like to ask you a question. I previously had a ureteral stone and underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy three times, which was ineffective. Later, I had endoscopic laser treatment, but the stone moved to my kidney, and now the kidney stone has gro...


Dr. Xu Weikai reply Urology
Hello, you may consider extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for stones larger than 1 cm, as they are difficult to pass. Daily life recommendations: 1. Drink plenty of water; aim for a daily urine output of over 1000 cc. 2. Reduce salt intake; avoid sauces, consume less broth, l...

[Read More] Managing Kidney Stones: Effective Treatments and Options for Relief


Effective Ways to Pass Ureteral Stones After Shock Wave Therapy

I have a question: I underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones on June 13. During my follow-up on June 20, it was reported that the stones had dropped into the bladder. At my follow-up on July 18, the stones were still in the bladder, and again on August...


Dr. Xu Wencang reply Urology
If discomfort persists, endoscopic surgery may be considered.

[Read More] Effective Ways to Pass Ureteral Stones After Shock Wave Therapy


Understanding Internal Lithotripsy: Procedure Duration and Risks Explained

Hello, my height is 165 cm and my weight is 90 kg. I am scheduled for an internal lithotripsy at this hospital because extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has not been effective after two attempts. How long does the surgery take? Are there any potential complications? The stone...


Dr. Chen Xiuyi reply Urology
Hello: After two sessions of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones, the results have been unsatisfactory. Possible reasons include the size of the stones and ureteral narrowing or swelling. Subsequent management typically involves endoscopic procedures, which ...

[Read More] Understanding Internal Lithotripsy: Procedure Duration and Risks Explained


Challenges in Kidney Stone Surgery: Understanding Incomplete Removal and Recurrence

Hello Doctor: In mid-September of this year, I went to the National Defense Medical Center in Hsinchu for an examination and found a left ureteral stone. After two sessions of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, there was no improvement. I underwent ureteroscopy and lithotrips...


Dr. Li Yilun reply Urology
Hello, sir. Your question pertains to a specific medical condition that requires discussion with your treating physician at the hospital. It is not possible to provide an assessment based solely on your description. I recommend that you consult directly with your surgeon, as the ...

[Read More] Challenges in Kidney Stone Surgery: Understanding Incomplete Removal and Recurrence


Related FAQ

Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy

(Urology)

Stones

(Urology)

Cholesteatoma

(Urology)

Hydronephrosis

(Urology)

Double J Stent

(Urology)

Abdomen

(Urology)

Trauma

(Urology)

Interstitial Cystitis

(Urology)

Post-Electrocautery

(Urology)

Escherichia Coli

(Urology)