Concerns About Bloodborne Disease Transmission During Blood Draws - Internal Medicine

Share to:

During blood draw, healthcare personnel directly touch the bleeding wound?


Today, I went to the hospital for a blood draw to perform a glucose tolerance test, which required four blood draws within two hours.
However, during the fourth blood draw, when the healthcare worker removed the cotton ball from the third draw, the puncture site from the third draw started bleeding again.
The healthcare worker seemed to press on the inner elbow area to confirm the venipuncture site, inadvertently touching the area where I was still bleeding, which resulted in a small smear of blood.
After a couple of minutes of discussion with another staff member, they resumed the blood draw, and again pressed on the venipuncture area, touching the still-bleeding site.
They then wiped the area that had not yet been punctured with an alcohol swab but did not clean the puncture sites from the previous three draws until the blood draw was completed and the cotton was reapplied.
The blood from the third draw had not completely dried, and the smear was still visible.
I would like to know if it is possible to contract any diseases (such as HIV or hepatitis) if the healthcare worker had blood from a previous patient on their hands that had not completely dried and then touched my still-bleeding puncture site.
Thank you.

Jeff Lu, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2022/01/24

Dr. Hong Yuanbin reply Internal Medicine


Hello, based on your description, typically after drawing blood from a patient, healthcare personnel will disinfect their hands with alcohol before drawing from the next patient, so it should not lead to the transmission of infectious diseases.
Thank you for your question.

Reply Date: 2022/01/24

More Info


When it comes to concerns about bloodborne disease transmission during blood draws, it is essential to understand the protocols and risks involved in such procedures. Bloodborne pathogens, including HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C, can be transmitted through direct contact with infected blood. However, the risk of transmission in a clinical setting, especially when proper protocols are followed, is generally low.

In your situation, several factors need to be considered. First, healthcare professionals are trained to follow strict infection control practices to minimize the risk of cross-contamination and transmission of infections. This includes using gloves, proper disposal of sharps, and sanitizing the skin before and after blood draws. The fact that the healthcare worker was wearing gloves is a positive sign, as it provides a barrier against potential pathogens.

However, your concern arises from the sequence of events during your blood draw. If the healthcare worker inadvertently touched your bleeding site with gloves that had come into contact with blood from a previous patient, there is a theoretical risk of transmission. Yet, several factors mitigate this risk:
1. Time Factor: Bloodborne viruses like HIV and hepatitis have varying survival times outside the human body. HIV, for example, does not survive long outside a human host and is not typically transmissible through dried blood. Hepatitis B and C can survive longer, but the risk of transmission decreases significantly as the blood dries.

2. Volume of Blood: The amount of blood that may have been transferred from the glove to your site is likely minimal. Transmission typically requires a significant amount of infected blood to enter the bloodstream.

3. Infection Control Protocols: Healthcare facilities are required to adhere to strict infection control protocols. If the healthcare worker followed proper procedures, the risk of transmission would be further reduced.

4. Immediate Action: If the healthcare worker noticed the bleeding and applied pressure, this action would help minimize the risk of blood exposure to the environment and reduce the chance of any potential pathogens entering your bloodstream.

While the theoretical risk exists, it is essential to keep in mind that the actual risk of contracting a bloodborne disease in this scenario is very low, especially if the healthcare facility follows standard precautions. If you are still concerned about potential exposure, it would be prudent to discuss your worries with your healthcare provider. They may recommend testing for peace of mind, especially if you experience any symptoms or have additional concerns.

In summary, while your concerns are valid, the risk of transmission of bloodborne diseases in a controlled clinical environment, especially when proper protocols are followed, is minimal. If you have ongoing worries, consulting with a healthcare professional for further evaluation and testing can provide reassurance and clarity.

Similar Q&A

Understanding Infection Risks in Blood Draw Procedures: Your Concerns Addressed

Hello doctor, I would like to ask a question. When I went to the hospital's blood draw station to pick something up, the phlebotomist was wearing gloves and had just finished drawing blood from someone else (without changing her gloves). When she handed me the item, she acci...


Dr. Ye Qianyu reply Family Medicine
Hello! Based on your description, the higher likelihood of exposure is to epidermal bacteria. If your skin is intact, the risk of infection should be low. Regarding the bloodborne pathogens you are concerned about, without any wounds, transmission cannot occur. Please continue to...

[Read More] Understanding Infection Risks in Blood Draw Procedures: Your Concerns Addressed


Concerns About HIV Infection from Blood Draws: What You Need to Know

Hello, Doctor: I recently visited a clinic near my home for a blood test. However, I started to worry about the hygiene of the clinic's needles (what if the nursing staff forgot to change reusable ones). If the previous patient was an HIV-positive individual, could I have be...


Dr. Li Xinyi reply Urology
Of course, we cannot endorse the clinic, but given the current medical situation in Taiwan, the likelihood of issues arising from blood draws is extremely low. However, if you are truly concerned, it is still advisable to go to a hospital for blood tests and discuss your concerns...

[Read More] Concerns About HIV Infection from Blood Draws: What You Need to Know


Understanding Blood Test Safety: Addressing Concerns About Contamination

Hello, doctor. I asked about the blood test procedure the day before yesterday (<a href="https://adoctor.tw/article/126694">#126694</a>), and I appreciate your response. I apologize for asking another question. Initially, I was very concerned that the paper ...


Dr. Chen Taicheng reply Family Medicine
● You don't need to worry about the risk of infection at all. Additionally, the purpose of disinfecting the blood draw site with alcohol is also for this reason. You can refer to similar responses in articles #126643 and #126615. ● Hepatitis B is transmitted through blood an...

[Read More] Understanding Blood Test Safety: Addressing Concerns About Contamination


Can Prolonged Exposure of Blood Draw Needles Lead to Contamination?

Hello, doctor: Two weeks ago, I went to a private laboratory for a blood draw. The technician opened the needle cap and was preparing to draw blood, but due to discussions about other tests and prices, it took 20-30 minutes before the needle was inserted into my vein. During this...


Dr. Chen Shidian reply Gastroenterology and Hepatology
There should be no contamination (there have been no reports of it), so please rest assured.

[Read More] Can Prolonged Exposure of Blood Draw Needles Lead to Contamination?


Related FAQ

Blood Draw

(Internal Medicine)

Blood Infection

(Internal Medicine)

Needlestick Injury

(Internal Medicine)

Hiv Transmission

(Internal Medicine)

Covid-19 Transmission

(Internal Medicine)

Contagion

(Internal Medicine)

Infection Risk

(Internal Medicine)

Rabies

(Internal Medicine)

Syphilis

(Internal Medicine)

Hepatitis B

(Internal Medicine)