Cardiac catheterization
In January 2021, I underwent a nuclear medicine myocardial perfusion imaging test that indicated hypoxia; however, I do not have hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia, and I did not experience symptoms of chest tightness or chest pain at that time.
The physician diagnosed it as a potential error in the myocardial imaging.
In 2022, I continued to experience chest tightness and chest pain, so I consulted another hospital's cardiology department.
An echocardiogram revealed grade II diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle, and a 24-hour Holter monitor showed a minimum heart rate of 50 and a maximum of 120 (normal range is 50-100).
The nuclear medicine cardiac imaging again indicated myocardial hypoxia.
Consequently, the doctor ordered a coronary angiogram, which showed no vascular obstruction.
Since I do not have any of the three high-risk conditions and the coronary angiogram results were normal, it was suggested that the nuclear medicine cardiac imaging may have been erroneous.
I would like to ask if it is normal for nuclear medicine cardiac imaging errors to occur consecutively in two different hospitals.
Does a normal coronary angiogram mean that the heart is entirely normal? I am concerned that while the blood vessels may be normal, there could be other issues with the heart causing the hypoxia, but I have not been able to identify the problem.
Thank you!
Calvin, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2022/05/06
Dr. Cai Guiqin reply Cardiology
It is recommended that you discuss the above situation further with your attending physician to determine if any additional examinations are necessary.
Thank you, and wishing you good health!
Reply Date: 2022/05/06
More Info
Understanding cardiac catheterization and the potential for misdiagnosis can be quite complex, especially when dealing with symptoms like chest pain and the results of various cardiac tests. Your situation highlights the importance of thorough evaluation and the challenges that can arise in diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) and other cardiac conditions.
Firstly, it’s essential to understand that myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), which you underwent, is a non-invasive test that assesses blood flow to the heart muscle during stress and at rest. While it is a valuable tool for detecting ischemia (reduced blood flow), it is not infallible. Factors such as patient movement, technical issues, or even the presence of artifacts can lead to misinterpretation of results. In your case, the MPI indicated myocardial ischemia despite the absence of traditional risk factors for CAD (like hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia) and the lack of significant symptoms at that time.
The subsequent echocardiogram revealing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and the 24-hour Holter monitor showing a heart rate variability outside the normal range suggest that there may be underlying issues that are not solely related to coronary artery blockages. Diastolic dysfunction can occur due to various reasons, including hypertension, aging, or even conditions like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which may not always be evident on standard tests.
When you underwent cardiac catheterization, which is considered the gold standard for diagnosing CAD, the absence of significant blockages in your coronary arteries is reassuring. However, it does not entirely rule out other potential cardiac issues. For instance, conditions like microvascular disease, where the smaller blood vessels are affected, may not be detected through standard angiography. This could explain the symptoms of chest pain and the findings of ischemia on the MPI.
Regarding your concern about the accuracy of the MPI results across two different hospitals, it is not typical for two separate tests to yield the same erroneous results, but it is not impossible either. Variability in patient conditions, stress protocols, and even the interpretation of images can lead to similar findings. It’s crucial to consider the entire clinical picture, including symptoms, physical examination findings, and results from all tests, rather than relying solely on one modality.
In conclusion, while the cardiac catheterization results indicate that your coronary arteries are clear, it is essential to continue investigating the underlying causes of your symptoms. You may benefit from further evaluation, such as advanced imaging techniques (like cardiac MRI) or consultations with a cardiologist specializing in heart failure or diastolic dysfunction. Additionally, lifestyle modifications, regular follow-ups, and possibly medications to manage symptoms may be warranted. Always communicate openly with your healthcare provider about your concerns and symptoms, as they can guide you in managing your heart health effectively.
Similar Q&A
Is There a Risk of Misdiagnosis in Cardiac Catheterization?
Hello, doctor. At the beginning of last year, I experienced chest tightness, and an exercise electrocardiogram showed slight signs of cardiac ischemia. After taking medication for a while without improvement, I was directly scheduled for a cardiac catheterization, which showed no...
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, the cardiac catheterization examination will not result in misjudgment; we need to investigate other causes. Changhua Hospital cares about you.[Read More] Is There a Risk of Misdiagnosis in Cardiac Catheterization?
Understanding Risks and Complications of Cardiac Catheterization
My brother needs to undergo a cardiac catheterization due to a myocardial infarction. However, I have heard about the risk of stroke following the procedure. What are the reasons for this? How high is the risk? If there are any complications, how would the physician handle them i...
Dr. Huang Guosheng reply Cardiology
Cardiac catheterization involves advancing a catheter through the radial or femoral artery to the coronary arteries of the heart. However, during this process, there is a risk of dislodging a blood clot from the aorta, which could lead to a stroke. The incidence of this complicat...[Read More] Understanding Risks and Complications of Cardiac Catheterization
Understanding Abnormal Exercise ECG: Risks and Next Steps for Heart Health
Hello Doctor: Regarding the question from the other day about the abnormal exercise electrocardiogram showing a positive hypoxic response, does this necessarily indicate vascular sclerosis and stenosis? Is there no possibility of a false positive? Why did you directly recommend a...
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, an abnormal exercise electrocardiogram showing a positive hypoxic response does not necessarily indicate vascular sclerosis or stenosis, and there is a possibility of false positives. Cardiac catheterization is a general term that includes procedures such as coronary angio...[Read More] Understanding Abnormal Exercise ECG: Risks and Next Steps for Heart Health
Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Is It Necessary for Your Health?
Hello Dr. Huang, I previously inquired with another physician about my family member's symptoms of rapid breathing and a sensation of being pricked. My family member is 55 years old and has not yet reached menopause. The physician I consulted earlier indicated that it is n...
Dr. Huang Yinghe reply Cardiology
Hello: Based on your description, a 55-year-old female with a history of secondhand smoke exposure and no hypertension. If there is no history of diabetes or high cholesterol, and no family history of cardiovascular disease, the likelihood of coronary artery disease is indeed low...[Read More] Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Is It Necessary for Your Health?
Related FAQ
(Cardiology)
Post-Cardiac Catheterization(Cardiology)
Electrocardiogram(Cardiology)
Chf(Cardiology)
Chest Pain(Cardiology)
Coronary Stent(Cardiology)
Coronary Artery Obstruction(Cardiology)
Health Check-Up Report(Cardiology)
Pacemaker(Cardiology)
Lightheadedness(Cardiology)