A radiation exposure of 6.081 millisieverts in one month could potentially increase the risk of cancer, depending on various factors such as individual susceptibility and overall health. Additionally, a total radiation dose of 6.131 millisieverts may also contribute to cancer risk, although the relationship between radiation exposure and cancer development is complex and influenced by cumulative exposure over time. It is important to consult with a medical professional for a comprehensive assessment of risk?
Hello Doctor: On March 7th of this month, I experienced lower back pain and went to the emergency room where I had spinal X-rays taken, including lateral views.
The health insurance app indicated a medical radiation reference dose of 1.454 millisieverts for the spinal X-rays and 2.077 millisieverts for the lateral views.
On March 24th, I had abdominal pain and underwent an abdominal X-ray, with the health insurance app showing a medical radiation reference dose of 1.275 millisieverts.
On April 4th, I suddenly had abdominal pain again and had another abdominal X-ray, which also showed a medical radiation reference dose of 1.275 millisieverts.
[A small question: Is there a risk in having abdominal X-rays taken 11 days apart?]
The total dose is: 1.275 + 1.275 + 1.454 + 2.077 = 6.081.
Last year, I also had a chest X-ray with a dose of 0.056.
Therefore, the total cumulative dose is 6.081 + 0.05 = 6.131.
Is there a possibility that this could increase the risk of cancer? I am quite anxious about this!
Mr. Hsu, 20~29 year old female. Ask Date: 2023/04/07
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, the necessity of X-ray radiation examinations is considered without limiting the radiation dose or the number of examinations.
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine issued a public statement in 2011 stating that if a single "radiation examination" has a radiation dose of less than 50 millisieverts, and multiple "radiation examinations" are conducted within a short period (such as one year) with a total dose of less than 100 millisieverts, the potential risks of the "radiation dose" can be disregarded, or even considered negligible.
Following your doctor's instructions to undergo radiation-related examinations is based on the assessment that the health benefits outweigh the effects of radiation.
If you have concerns, it is advisable to communicate further with your physician before proceeding with the examination.
Do not avoid examinations out of fear of radiation, as this may lead to missed opportunities for disease treatment.
Please refer to the above information, and I wish you peace and health.
Ministry of Health and Welfare Health Passbook Press Release https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-5023-64571-1.html American Radiologic Technologists website https://www.xrayrisk.com/calculator/calculator.php
Reply Date: 2023/04/07
More Info
The concern regarding radiation exposure from medical imaging, particularly in relation to cancer risk, is a common one among patients. Your total radiation dose of 6.131 mSv, derived from multiple X-ray examinations, is indeed a valid concern, but it is essential to contextualize this figure within the broader framework of radiation exposure and cancer risk.
First, let's break down the numbers. The average person is exposed to about 3 mSv of natural background radiation each year from sources such as cosmic rays, radon, and terrestrial radiation. Medical imaging can add to this exposure, but the doses from individual X-ray procedures are generally quite low. For instance, a standard chest X-ray typically delivers about 0.1 mSv, while a lumbar spine X-ray can range from 1 to 2 mSv depending on the technique used.
In your case, the total calculated dose of 6.131 mSv is relatively modest when compared to the annual background radiation exposure. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) suggests that doses below 100 mSv are unlikely to cause any significant health effects, including cancer. The risk of developing cancer from radiation exposure is often expressed as a statistical increase in risk, and for doses around 10 mSv, the risk of developing cancer is estimated to increase by about 0.01% to 0.05%. Therefore, your total dose of 6.131 mSv would correspond to a very small increase in risk, likely in the range of 0.006% to 0.03%.
Regarding your specific question about the interval between X-rays, the frequency of imaging should always be justified by the clinical need. In general, repeating X-rays within a short time frame, such as 11 days, is acceptable if there is a clear medical indication. The potential benefits of diagnosing and treating a condition often outweigh the risks associated with the radiation exposure from the imaging.
It is also important to note that the cumulative risk of cancer from radiation exposure is a complex topic. While there is a theoretical risk associated with any exposure to ionizing radiation, the actual increase in cancer risk from your total dose of 6.131 mSv is minimal. The majority of cancers are influenced by a multitude of factors, including genetics, lifestyle, and environmental exposures, with radiation being just one of many potential contributors.
In conclusion, while it is prudent to be aware of radiation exposure and to minimize unnecessary imaging, your total dose of 6.131 mSv is not likely to pose a significant cancer risk. It is crucial to maintain open communication with your healthcare provider about your concerns and the necessity of any imaging studies. They can help you weigh the risks and benefits of further imaging and ensure that your health is monitored appropriately. Remember, avoiding necessary medical care due to fear of radiation can lead to missed diagnoses and treatment opportunities, which can be far more detrimental to your health.
Similar Q&A
Understanding Annual Radiation Dose Limits: What You Need to Know
Hello, doctor. I have one more question to ask; I have seen many Q&As in this section, and doctors often mention, "According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Report 103, a dose below 100 millisieverts (mSv), whether received in a single e...
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection's Report No. 60, when a person is exposed to a radiation dose of 100 millisieverts, their risk of developing cancer increases by 0.24% compared to someone who has not been exposed. This means that if 100,00...[Read More] Understanding Annual Radiation Dose Limits: What You Need to Know
Understanding Radiation Risks: Should You Worry About Your Exposure?
Hello, doctor. I would like to ask: my total radiation exposure is 36.2 millisieverts, and the additional cancer risk is approximately 0.5%. Does this mean that my likelihood of developing cancer is significantly increased? I have been constantly thinking about the effects of rad...
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello: According to the report in the 115th issue of Health Magazine, lifestyle is closely related to the occurrence of cancer, with very few cancers having a genetic association. The American Institute for Cancer Research published "Stopping Cancer Before It Starts," w...[Read More] Understanding Radiation Risks: Should You Worry About Your Exposure?
Understanding Radiation Risks from Frequent CT Scans: What You Need to Know
Hello, Doctor. In September 2018, I was diagnosed with a salivary gland tumor, and I underwent a CT scan of the head and neck with contrast, as well as a chest X-ray, in preparation for surgery. Later, in December 2018, another CT scan of the head and neck with contrast was perfo...
Dr. Ye Weicheng reply Radiology
The harmful effects of ionizing radiation on human health are divided into deterministic effects and stochastic effects. Deterministic effects refer to harmful tissue responses resulting from exposure to excessive radiation; as the dose increases, the severity of the damage also ...[Read More] Understanding Radiation Risks from Frequent CT Scans: What You Need to Know
Understanding Radiation Risks in Nuclear Medicine: Patient Concerns Addressed
My female patient had an MRI of the lungs in December and is scheduled for a nuclear medicine thyroid scan in May. Will this pose any harm to her body? Is there a risk of cellular mutation?
Dr. Zheng Xiaoyi reply Nuclear Medicine
Hello, Miss Peng. According to the literature, low-dose radiation exposure below 100 millisieverts does not increase the risk of cancer, and most nuclear medicine examinations involve radiation exposure below this threshold, so they do not significantly impact human health. If yo...[Read More] Understanding Radiation Risks in Nuclear Medicine: Patient Concerns Addressed
Related FAQ
(Radiology)
Ct Scan Radiation(Radiology)
Radiation(Oncology)
Radiation(Nuclear Medicine)
Iodine-131(Nuclear Medicine)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging(Radiology)
Mri Report(Radiology)
Radiation(Obstetrics and Gynecology)
Pet Scan Report(Oncology)
Contrast Agent(Radiology)