CA19-9 Issues
Thank you for your response, doctor.
In the previous question, I mentioned that my CA 19-9 levels were over 5 three years ago, and this year they were over 15 and then over 17 two months later.
You suggested an abdominal ultrasound or MRI.
I would like to ask if I should repeat the abdominal MRI screening I had last year, which was normal, or if it would be better to do an abdominal ultrasound or an endoscopic ultrasound of the pancreas instead? Thank you.
Mr. Long, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2023/04/22
Dr. Chen Shidian reply Gastroenterology and Hepatology
There is no need for further MRI examination.
Follow-up with ultrasound is sufficient.
Reply Date: 2023/04/22
More Info
When it comes to elevated CA19-9 levels, the decision to repeat an MRI or switch to ultrasound is nuanced and should be based on several factors, including previous imaging results, clinical symptoms, and the specific context of the CA19-9 elevation.
CA19-9 is a tumor marker primarily associated with pancreatic cancer, but it can also be elevated in other conditions, including cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, and even benign conditions such as pancreatitis or liver disease. It is important to note that CA19-9 is not a definitive diagnostic tool; it has a high rate of false positives and should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings and imaging studies.
In your case, you mentioned that your CA19-9 levels have increased from 5 to 15 and then to 17 over a span of a few months. While these values are elevated compared to your baseline, they are still relatively low in the context of CA19-9 levels, which can reach much higher values in malignancies. Given that you had a normal MRI last year, it may not be necessary to repeat this imaging modality immediately, especially if there are no new symptoms or significant changes in your clinical status.
Ultrasound is a useful tool for evaluating the abdominal organs, including the pancreas, liver, and gallbladder. It is less expensive and less time-consuming than an MRI, and it can be performed more frequently. However, it is important to note that ultrasound has limitations, particularly in visualizing the pancreas due to its retroperitoneal location and the presence of bowel gas, which can obscure the view. If there are concerns about pancreatic pathology that ultrasound cannot adequately address, an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may be warranted. EUS is particularly useful for obtaining fine-needle aspiration biopsies if a suspicious lesion is identified.
In your situation, if the previous MRI was normal and you are not experiencing any new symptoms, it may be reasonable to start with an abdominal ultrasound. This approach allows for monitoring of any changes in the abdominal organs without the need for immediate repeat MRI. If the ultrasound reveals any abnormalities or if your CA19-9 levels continue to rise, further imaging, such as a repeat MRI or EUS, could be considered at that time.
Additionally, it is crucial to maintain regular follow-ups with your healthcare provider to monitor your CA19-9 levels and any potential symptoms. If you have a family history of pancreatic cancer or other risk factors, this should be discussed with your physician, as they may recommend more aggressive monitoring or additional imaging studies.
In summary, given your previous normal MRI and the relatively low elevation of CA19-9, starting with an abdominal ultrasound seems appropriate. If there are any concerns or if your levels continue to rise, further imaging can be pursued based on clinical judgment. Always consult your healthcare provider for personalized advice tailored to your specific medical history and circumstances.
Similar Q&A
Understanding Elevated CA19-9 Levels: When to Consider Further Testing
Hello doctor, my CA 19-9 level has been elevated; it was 32 two years ago and now it's 39. I had a CT scan of the pancreas two years ago, and the doctor advised me to have regular ultrasounds. However, I know that ultrasounds cannot visualize the pancreas well. Would you rec...
Dr. Chen Shidian reply Gastroenterology and Hepatology
CA 19-9 is not very accurate; it should only be used as a reference. Regular monitoring is recommended, although there are currently no standard guidelines. If you are still concerned, you may consider undergoing additional tests (possibly out-of-pocket) for peace of mind.[Read More] Understanding Elevated CA19-9 Levels: When to Consider Further Testing
Understanding Rising Tumor Markers: What You Need to Know
Hello, Doctor. Two years ago, my CA 19-9 level was 5. This year, from February to May, the levels have risen from 15 to 17, 18, and then 23. 1. I would like to know if this increase is significant. Could it be due to inflammation or something else? 2. Should I get checked now, ...
Dr. Hu Ziren reply Oncology
Some inflammation of the bile ducts and gastrointestinal tract can cause a mild elevation of CA 19-9 (>37); however, as long as the values remain within the normal range, they are considered normal. It is advisable not to be overly anxious about this.[Read More] Understanding Rising Tumor Markers: What You Need to Know
Understanding Elevated CA19-9 Levels: What You Need to Know
Hello Dr. Chen: In 2009, I was found to have an elevated CA 19-9 level (64). At that time, I underwent various examinations, including MRI and endoscopy, which revealed a 9 cm benign focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) in the liver, while the pancreas and other organs showed no issue...
Dr. Chen Sirong reply Oncology
Jeff/34/01. I have heard that if it is cancer, the CA19-9 level will significantly increase after retesting in a month. If my CA19-9 level does not change much when I test again next month, can I feel more at ease? Answer: Yes, some benign conditions can also lead to an elevati...[Read More] Understanding Elevated CA19-9 Levels: What You Need to Know
Understanding Abnormal CA19-9 Levels: Next Steps for Patients
Hello Doctor, About three weeks ago, I went to the hospital for a self-paid health checkup. Due to my menstrual period, I first underwent abdominal/pelvic/breast ultrasound, and a week later, I completed blood, urine, and stool tests. During the ultrasound, multiple cysts were ...
Dr. Chen Shidian reply Gastroenterology and Hepatology
CA 19-9 cannot be used for diagnosis due to a very high rate of false positives; its interpretation depends on the individual physician's perspective. The principle is that if there are no specific tumors found during health screenings, one can feel reassured. It would be ad...[Read More] Understanding Abnormal CA19-9 Levels: Next Steps for Patients
Related FAQ
(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Ca199(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Ct Scan(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Colonoscopy(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Stomachache(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Cholecystitis(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Navel(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Ibs(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Bowel Sounds(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Cecum(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)