Is Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Necessary for My Condition? - Cardiology

Share to:

Is it necessary to perform an invasive cardiac catheterization?


Consultation with the doctor: Due to having atrial fibrillation and slightly elevated heart failure indices, I am currently taking Apixaban, Carvedilol, Bisoprolol, Nebivolol, and Furosemide for control.
My heart rate is stable, maintained between 60-70 bpm, and my blood pressure, blood sugar, and triglycerides are all within normal ranges.
I do not experience symptoms such as chest pain or tightness.
However, my doctor recently arranged for a stress electrocardiogram and myocardial perfusion scan.

TECHNIQUE: Following the intravenous injection of 2 mCi of Tl-201 Chloride after intravenous administration of dipyridamole (Persantin) at a dose of 0.56 mg/kg over 3-5 minutes, SPECT imaging of the heart was performed using a cardiac-centered CZT camera with ECG gating (8-frame acquisition).
After an equilibration period of approximately 3-4 hours, the patient was imaged in a similar manner while at rest.
Single photon emission tomograms of the left ventricle were reconstructed in horizontal and vertical long-axis, as well as short-axis projections.
Bull's eye analysis was performed on paired, registered (stress/redistribution) short-axis images.
Data from the ECG-gated SPECT were analyzed and displayed.
SCINTIGRAPHIC FINDINGS:
(1) A perfusion defect of the left ventricle (LV) is noted:
* Mild-to-moderate perfusion defect at the basal anterolateral wall, with reverse redistribution and partial reversibility.
(2) Lung uptake is normal.
* Lung-to-heart ratio during stress: 0.27
* Lung-to-heart ratio at rest: 0.28
(3) Extent of perfusion defects by Bull’s eye analysis:
* Stress → rest: LAD: 8%→ 4%, LCX: 0%→ 0%, RCA: 0%→ 0%.
* Reversible defect: LAD 3%, LCX 0%, RCA 0%.
* Fixed defect: LAD 5%, LCX 0%, RCA 0%.
* Total perfusion defect: stress 4%; rest 2%; reverse 2%.
* Severity of perfusion defects: SSS of 0, SDS of 0.
(4) ECG-gated SPECT results:
* Stress/Rest LVEF: 71%/67%.
* No obvious wall motion abnormality.
IMPRESSION: The positive MPI study is summarized below:
(1) Mild-to-moderate ischemia at the basal anterolateral wall.
(2) Stress/Rest LVEF: 71%/67%; No wall motion abnormality.
(Remarks)
* MPI (myocardial perfusion imaging) focused on the LV of the heart.
After the report was released, my attending physician recommended further coronary angiography.
I would like to ask if my condition is severe enough to require invasive coronary angiography, considering that I do not have symptoms such as chest pain, tightness, or shortness of breath.

Mr. Hsieh, 50~59 year old female. Ask Date: 2023/07/11

Dr. Wu Xueming reply Cardiology


If there are no symptoms under medication control, it is not necessary to undergo cardiac catheterization; regular medication and outpatient follow-up are sufficient.

Reply Date: 2023/07/11

More Info


Invasive cardiac catheterization is a procedure that allows doctors to examine the heart's blood vessels and chambers. It is often used to diagnose and treat various heart conditions, particularly coronary artery disease (CAD). Given your medical history, including atrial fibrillation and slightly elevated heart failure markers, along with the results from your recent myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), it is understandable to question the necessity of this invasive procedure.

From the findings of your MPI, there is evidence of mild-to-moderate ischemia in the basal anterolateral wall of the left ventricle, which indicates that there may be some degree of reduced blood flow to that area of the heart. However, it is crucial to note that your left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains adequate, with values of 71% during stress and 67% at rest, and there are no significant wall motion abnormalities. These results suggest that while there is some ischemic activity, the overall function of your heart is preserved.

The decision to proceed with invasive cardiac catheterization typically hinges on several factors, including the severity of symptoms, the degree of ischemia, and the overall clinical picture. In your case, you report no chest pain, shortness of breath, or other concerning symptoms, which is a positive sign. Additionally, your heart rate is well-controlled, and other cardiovascular risk factors, such as blood pressure, blood sugar, and triglycerides, are within normal ranges.

Invasive procedures like cardiac catheterization carry inherent risks, including bleeding, infection, and complications related to contrast dye used during the procedure. Therefore, it is essential to weigh these risks against the potential benefits. If your symptoms are stable and manageable with medication, and if your healthcare provider believes that the current non-invasive tests provide sufficient information, it may not be necessary to proceed with catheterization at this time.

However, the recommendation for catheterization may also stem from a desire to obtain a more definitive diagnosis or to evaluate the extent of coronary artery disease, especially if there are concerns about the potential for future cardiac events. If your healthcare provider has suggested this course of action, it is likely based on their assessment of your risk factors and the findings from your tests.

Ultimately, the decision should involve a thorough discussion with your cardiologist. They can provide insights based on your specific situation, including the potential need for further evaluation versus the risks associated with the procedure. If you feel uncertain or uncomfortable about proceeding with catheterization, seeking a second opinion or discussing alternative diagnostic options, such as advanced imaging techniques or additional non-invasive tests, may also be beneficial.

In summary, while your MPI results indicate some ischemic changes, the absence of significant symptoms and the preservation of heart function suggest that invasive cardiac catheterization may not be immediately necessary. A collaborative discussion with your healthcare provider will help clarify the best path forward for your cardiac health.

Similar Q&A

Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Purpose, Risks, and What to Expect

Hello Dr. Lee: I went for a check-up for heart disease, and in addition to an electrocardiogram and cardiac imaging, the doctor is now requesting that I be hospitalized for a cardiac catheterization. What is cardiac catheterization? Why is this test necessary, and why do I need t...


Dr. Li Huixiong reply Internal Medicine
In simple terms, cardiac catheterization or cardiac catheter therapy refers to the procedure of inserting a thin tube through the skin and into the blood vessels to reach the heart for further examination, evaluation, or treatment. From your description, it is understood that you...

[Read More] Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Purpose, Risks, and What to Expect


Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Is It Necessary After Abnormal Imaging?

If a myocardial perfusion scan shows 5% of the area with hypoxia, and both the electrocardiogram and echocardiogram are normal, is this considered serious? Is it necessary to undergo a coronary catheterization? What is the likelihood of needing a stent due to blockage? Thank you.


Dr. Huang Yinghe reply Cardiology
Hello: If there are no symptoms such as chest tightness or shortness of breath, the general approach is to manage diet and exercise, along with medication for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. If the aforementioned symptoms are present and medication is not effectively ...

[Read More] Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Is It Necessary After Abnormal Imaging?


Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Is It Necessary for Your Health?

Hello Dr. Huang, I previously inquired with another physician about my family member's symptoms of rapid breathing and a sensation of being pricked. My family member is 55 years old and has not yet reached menopause. The physician I consulted earlier indicated that it is n...


Dr. Huang Yinghe reply Cardiology
Hello: Based on your description, a 55-year-old female with a history of secondhand smoke exposure and no hypertension. If there is no history of diabetes or high cholesterol, and no family history of cardiovascular disease, the likelihood of coronary artery disease is indeed low...

[Read More] Understanding Cardiac Catheterization: Is It Necessary for Your Health?


Do I Need a Cardiac Catheterization? Understanding Your Heart Health Concerns

Hello, doctor. I occasionally experience dizziness and shortness of breath when climbing stairs, and my hemoglobin level is slightly below the standard value. Other symptoms are fine. I have undergone a Doppler echocardiogram and an electrocardiogram. Do I need to undergo a cardi...


Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, the information you provided is limited, so I can't confidently say whether there are issues with the exercise test report without seeing the details. It's difficult to advise on how to feel reassured or what actions to take. Changhua Hospital cares about your we...

[Read More] Do I Need a Cardiac Catheterization? Understanding Your Heart Health Concerns


Related FAQ

Cardiac Catheterization

(Cardiology)

Post-Cardiac Catheterization

(Cardiology)

Cardiac Examination

(Cardiology)

Coronary Stent

(Cardiology)

Coronary Artery Obstruction

(Cardiology)

Endocarditis

(Cardiology)

Ablation

(Cardiology)

Afib

(Cardiology)

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

(Cardiology)

Valve Insufficiency

(Cardiology)