Cardiac issues
In a cardiac ultrasound (echocardiogram), the ejection fraction (EF) can be measured using two different modes: M-mode and 2D (two-dimensional) mode.
The values obtained from these two methods may differ due to the techniques used for measurement.
M-mode echocardiography provides a single-dimensional view of the heart's chambers and is often used to measure the dimensions of the left ventricle in a specific plane.
It can be very accurate for certain measurements but may not capture the full motion of the heart.
On the other hand, 2D echocardiography provides a more comprehensive view of the heart, allowing for the assessment of the heart's structure and function in multiple planes.
This mode is generally considered more reliable for calculating ejection fraction because it takes into account the overall volume changes of the left ventricle during the cardiac cycle.
In clinical practice, the 2D ejection fraction is usually preferred as it provides a more accurate representation of the heart's pumping ability.
However, both measurements can be
Si, 20~29 year old female. Ask Date: 2023/08/03
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, as long as there is progress, it doesn't matter if the measurement methods differ.
Estimating the ejection fraction from the outside can never be 100% accurate, and the measured values may vary each time.
It's sufficient to get a rough estimate for evaluation, so there's no need to worry.
Changhua Hospital cares about you.
Reply Date: 2023/08/03
More Info
M-mode and 2D echocardiography are two distinct modalities used in cardiac ultrasound to assess heart structure and function, and understanding their differences is crucial for interpreting echocardiographic data accurately.
M-Mode Echocardiography: M-mode, or motion mode, provides a one-dimensional view of the heart. It captures the motion of the heart structures over time, allowing for precise measurements of dimensions and wall motion. The M-mode is particularly useful for measuring chamber sizes, wall thickness, and the motion of valves. It is often used to calculate the ejection fraction (EF), which is a key indicator of heart function. The EF is calculated by measuring the left ventricular dimensions at end-diastole and end-systole, allowing clinicians to assess how well the heart is pumping blood.
2D Echocardiography: In contrast, 2D echocardiography provides a two-dimensional view of the heart, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment of cardiac anatomy and function. This mode captures images of the heart from various angles, enabling the visualization of the heart chambers, valves, and surrounding structures in real-time. 2D echocardiography is essential for assessing the overall morphology of the heart, detecting structural abnormalities, and evaluating the function of the heart valves. It can also be used to calculate the ejection fraction using different methods, such as the Simpson's method, which can provide a more accurate assessment of left ventricular function.
Differences in Ejection Fraction Measurements: The ejection fraction values obtained from M-mode and 2D echocardiography may differ due to the inherent differences in how each modality measures heart function. M-mode measurements are based on linear dimensions, while 2D echocardiography considers the volume of the left ventricle. As a result, M-mode may sometimes underestimate or overestimate the ejection fraction compared to 2D echocardiography. It is important to note that both methods have their advantages and limitations, and the choice of which to use may depend on the clinical context and the specific information needed.
Which Value to Trust: When faced with differing ejection fraction values from M-mode and 2D echocardiography, it is generally advisable to consider the 2D echocardiography value as more reliable. This is because 2D echocardiography provides a more comprehensive view of the heart's function and structure, allowing for a better assessment of overall cardiac performance. However, it is essential to discuss these findings with your healthcare provider, who can interpret the results in the context of your overall health and any symptoms you may be experiencing.
In summary, both M-mode and 2D echocardiography are valuable tools in assessing cardiac function, but they serve different purposes and provide different types of information. Understanding these differences can help patients and healthcare providers make informed decisions regarding diagnosis and treatment. If you have concerns about your heart function or the interpretation of your echocardiogram results, it is crucial to consult with your cardiologist or healthcare provider for personalized guidance and recommendations.
Similar Q&A
Understanding the Differences Between M-Mode and 2D Echocardiography
Hello, doctor. I have some follow-up questions regarding <a href="https://adoctor.tw/article/192205">#192205</a>. 1. What is the difference between M-mode and 2D-mode? I really don't understand. 2. Isn't M-mode the one that is usually used? 3. Wh...
Dr. He Dongjin reply Cardiology
Hello, the difference between M-mode and 2D mode lies in the measurement methods. It's understandable that non-professionals may find it difficult to comprehend; simply put, M-mode is a one-dimensional measurement while 2D mode provides a two-dimensional view. Generally, 3D ...[Read More] Understanding the Differences Between M-Mode and 2D Echocardiography
Understanding Echocardiogram Results: When to Seek a Second Opinion
Hello Doctor: This is the echocardiogram M-MODE data I had a year ago before undergoing cardiac ablation surgery: M-MODE DATA: - Aortic Valve Opening (mm): (15-26) - Interventricular Septum (mm): 8 (6-10) - Aortic Root (mm): 22 (20-39) - Left Ventricular Posterior Wall (mm)...
Dr. Chen Jili reply Cardiology
We recommend that you discuss the above situation further with your attending physician to determine if additional treatment is necessary. Thank you, and we wish you good health![Read More] Understanding Echocardiogram Results: When to Seek a Second Opinion
Understanding the Differences in Echocardiogram Reports for Heart Failure
Hello, doctor. I inquired about my recent echocardiogram report the day before yesterday (thank you very much for your response). Could you please help me review the echocardiogram from June 2022? I would like to understand the differences compared to my recent echocardiogram. Du...
Dr. Huang Yinghe reply Cardiology
Hello: The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was previously poor (35%), indicating that the heart's contraction was relatively weak at that time. Recently, there has been an improvement, which is likely a result of medication. Please continue to take your medication ...[Read More] Understanding the Differences in Echocardiogram Reports for Heart Failure
Understanding Heart Murmurs: Insights from Echocardiogram Reports
# 2978 Clinical Diagnosis: M-mode + Section Scan: Aortic Root (20-37 mm): 39, Left Anterior Descending (LAD) (19-40 mm): 62, Left Ventricular Internal Diameter at End-Diastole (LVIDd) (35-51 mm): 55, Left Ventricular Internal Diameter at End-Systole (LVIDs) (28-35 mm): 30, Ventri...
Dr. Li Shengkai reply Cardiology
Based on your medical history and the report you provided, your "mitral valve regurgitation" is classified as severe, and it is associated with left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy. It is recommended that you promptly return to your original hospital...[Read More] Understanding Heart Murmurs: Insights from Echocardiogram Reports
Related FAQ
(Cardiology)
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging(Cardiology)
Electrocardiogram(Cardiology)
Electrocardiogram(Internal Medicine)
Mitral Valve(Cardiology)
Afib(Cardiology)
Ectopic Beats(Cardiology)
Myocarditis(Cardiology)
Pulse(Cardiology)
Myocardial Hypoxia(Cardiology)