Do Cell Phone Radiation Waves Really Harm Your Health? - Radiology

Share to:

Mobile phone electromagnetic waves


Hello Dr.
Wu, I would like to ask you about the effects of mobile phone electromagnetic waves on the human body.
I am unsure, but there are always some media or online reports suggesting that they can cause harm to the brain or body.
Is this true? I often comfort myself by thinking that since hundreds of millions of people use them globally, it should be fine.
Due to work, I cannot turn off my phone.
I have heard that using anti-radiation stickers on phones is merely a psychological comfort and actually ineffective.
Is that true? Sometimes it is inconvenient to keep the phone on my body, and I wonder if using a hands-free headset or earphones is safe.
Due to work, I often have long conversations, and I worry about this because I don't understand it well.
Thank you.

Yi Lin, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2004/03/28

Dr. Wu Bin'an reply Radiology


Dear Yilin netizen: I apologize for the delayed response due to my busy work schedule.
Regarding your question, I have gathered relevant information and provide the following answers:
1.
Electromagnetic waves can be classified into two types based on energy levels: ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation.

(1) Ionizing radiation: This is produced by radioactive elements and typically has higher energy, sufficient to disrupt molecular structures into charged ions, which can alter or damage biological cells, leading to pathological changes.

(2) Non-ionizing radiation: This is emitted by common household appliances or mobile phones during use, and the energy produced is generally weaker, insufficient to disrupt molecular structures into charged ions.
However, with prolonged exposure to radiation or increased energy, there may be some biological effects.
2.
The impact of electromagnetic waves on the human body is related to the frequency, power, and distance of the radiation.
Direct penetration and high-temperature effects can cause qualitative changes in cells.
Generally, if the distance and power of radiation remain constant, higher frequencies result in deeper tissue penetration; conversely, at the same frequency, greater power also leads to deeper penetration, but as the distance increases, the radiation intensity will decrease.
3.
According to a research report commissioned by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications on November 15, 2001, conducted by the Department of Electrical Engineering at National Sun Yat-sen University and Chang Gung University, which assessed the impact of mobile phones and base station electromagnetic waves on human health, it was found that the electromagnetic wave emissions from domestic base stations and popular mobile phone models are far below the "non-ionizing radiation environmental recommended values" announced by the Environmental Protection Administration on January 12, 2001.
It also verified that commercially available anti-radiation stickers have no practical efficacy.
Additionally, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications completed surveys and measurements of electromagnetic waves from mobile phone base stations in the Greater Taipei, Greater Taichung, Greater Kaohsiung, and eastern regions during 2002, finding that the electromagnetic wave intensity in these four areas of Taiwan is generally similar, ranging from approximately 1.8E-6 to 2.3E-5 mW/cm², with the electromagnetic waves emitted by 1800 MHz system antennas being slightly stronger than those from 900 MHz system antennas.
All measurements complied with the current "non-ionizing radiation environmental recommended values" announced by the Environmental Protection Administration.
The SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) testing regulations in various countries set a minimum value of 1.6 W/kg, which can serve as a basis for selecting mobile phones.
In this research report, electromagnetic radiation tests were conducted on mobile phones such as Motorola V3688, Ericsson T28, Nokia 3310, and Acer M330, showing that these phones all had SAR values less than 1.6 W/kg.
Furthermore, commercially available anti-radiation stickers did not reduce the SAR values.
4.
To date, there is no conclusive evidence from domestic and international studies that electromagnetic radiation-derived biological effects directly cause tumors or cancer.
Long-term follow-up and epidemiological studies are necessary to provide the public with a clearer understanding of the effects of electromagnetic waves.
5.
Recommendations:
(1) When using mobile phones, please use hands-free headsets or earphones to keep the antenna as far from the body as possible.
(2) If hands-free headsets or earphones cannot be used, ensure that the antenna is fully extended during calls and minimize call duration.
Since radiation is primarily emitted from the middle section of the antenna, if the antenna is retracted into the device, the entire mobile phone acts as an antenna, expanding the radiation range to the head, jaw, and hands.
(3) Children under ten should avoid using any wireless devices; it is recommended to use pagers, as they can be kept away from the head and body.
(4) Avoid using mobile phones in areas with poor reception, as weaker signals cause the mobile phone to increase power to maintain communication, resulting in stronger radiation.

Reply Date: 2004/03/28

More Info


The concern regarding cell phone radiation and its potential health effects has been a topic of debate for many years. As you mentioned, there are numerous reports and articles that suggest a link between cell phone radiation and various health issues, particularly brain tumors. However, the scientific consensus on this matter is still evolving, and it's essential to understand the nuances involved.

Firstly, it is crucial to differentiate between the types of radiation emitted by cell phones. Cell phones emit non-ionizing radiation, which is a type of electromagnetic radiation that does not carry enough energy to ionize atoms or molecules or remove tightly bound electrons. This is in contrast to ionizing radiation, such as X-rays or gamma rays, which can cause cellular damage and increase cancer risk. Non-ionizing radiation, including that from cell phones, is generally considered to be less harmful.

Research has shown that the energy emitted by cell phones is relatively low and typically insufficient to cause significant heating of body tissues. The primary concern arises from prolonged exposure, especially when the phone is held close to the head during calls. Studies have indicated that the specific absorption rate (SAR) of various cell phone models is well below the safety limits set by regulatory agencies. For example, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States has established a maximum SAR limit of 1.6 watts per kilogram, and most phones on the market comply with this standard.

Regarding the use of hands-free devices, such as earphones or speakerphone, these can indeed reduce exposure to radiation. By keeping the phone away from the head, you minimize the amount of radiation absorbed by the brain. It is advisable to use these devices whenever possible, especially during long conversations. If you must hold the phone to your ear, try to keep the call duration short and ensure that the antenna is extended, as radiation is primarily emitted from the antenna.

As for the effectiveness of radiation shielding products, such as anti-radiation stickers, studies have shown that these products do not significantly reduce radiation exposure. The best way to minimize exposure is to use hands-free options and limit the time spent on calls.

In terms of the potential link between cell phone use and brain tumors, the evidence remains inconclusive. Some studies have suggested a possible association, while others have found no significant correlation. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization (WHO), has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" based on limited evidence. However, this classification does not imply a definitive causal relationship.

It is also important to consider that cancer is a multifactorial disease influenced by various factors, including genetics, environmental exposures, and lifestyle choices. The risk of developing cancer from cell phone use is likely to be very low, especially when compared to other established risk factors.

In conclusion, while there is ongoing research into the health effects of cell phone radiation, current evidence does not support the notion that using a cell phone poses a significant health risk. However, it is wise to take precautionary measures, such as using hands-free devices and limiting call duration, to reduce exposure. If you have specific health concerns or experience symptoms that you believe may be related to cell phone use, it is advisable to consult a healthcare professional for personalized advice.

Similar Q&A

Do Cell Phones Really Cause Cancer? Debunking the Myths

There are concerns that mobile phone signals may affect brain waves and potentially lead to tumor development. However, the scientific evidence on this matter is still inconclusive. It is not necessary to completely avoid using mobile phones, but it may be prudent to limit exposu...


Dr. Li Junde reply Surgery
Hello, Miss Mel: Current evidence has confirmed that electromagnetic waves from mobile phones can interfere with electronic devices, with the strongest interference occurring during transmission and searching. When a person has a pacemaker implanted, this interference can pose a ...

[Read More] Do Cell Phones Really Cause Cancer? Debunking the Myths


Do Cell Phones and Wireless Earbuds Increase Brain Tumor Risk?

Doctor, I am a 17-year-old male, and I am recently very concerned about brain tumors. Does using a mobile phone and wireless earbuds increase the risk of cancer?


Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, mobile phones have gradually become a common communication device since 1990. Whether they affect human health and increase the risk of cancer currently lacks a definitive conclusion. The following information about mobile phones comes from the American Cancer Society webs...

[Read More] Do Cell Phones and Wireless Earbuds Increase Brain Tumor Risk?


Do Cell Tower Electromagnetic Waves Affect Health and Cancer Risk?

Hello Dr. Lai: There are several cellular base stations installed on a high building near my home (about 100 meters away). They have been in place for about ten years, and I recently heard that many people living nearby have been diagnosed with cancer. I would like to know if the...


Dr. Lai Junlong reply Family Medicine
Hello: The radio frequency signals emitted by mobile phone base stations or fixed antennas are a type of non-ionizing radiation that does not produce thermal effects. Generally, the output power of a base station is around 100 watts or more, which is significantly lower than the ...

[Read More] Do Cell Tower Electromagnetic Waves Affect Health and Cancer Risk?


Impact of Cell Phone Radiation on Sperm: Concerns for IVF Success

Hello, doctor. I am scheduled to undergo artificial insemination (sperm separation technique) next month in hopes of having a baby boy. However, I have been carrying my phone on my waist recently and have received over ten calls (which I used to do less frequently). I have heard ...


Dr. Zhang Yongxuan reply Obstetrics and Gynecology
1. Not necessarily, staying a bit farther away is safer. 2. Not necessarily, although conception may be successful, the normal development and growth of the embryo thereafter require regular prenatal check-ups and monitoring.

[Read More] Impact of Cell Phone Radiation on Sperm: Concerns for IVF Success


Related FAQ

Radiation

(Radiology)

Ct Scan Radiation

(Radiology)

Radiation

(Nuclear Medicine)

X-Ray Examination

(Radiology)

Mri Report

(Radiology)

Radiation

(Obstetrics and Gynecology)

Radiation Therapy

(Oncology)

Tinnitus

(Family Medicine)

Lump

(Otolaryngology)

Thyroid

(Otolaryngology)