Visual Field Loss After Stroke: Disability Certification Insights - Ophthalmology

More Info

---

Visual field loss following a stroke can significantly impact a person's daily life and ability to function independently. In your father's case, a 50% loss of visual field is indeed a serious condition that may warrant consideration for disability certification. However, the process of obtaining such certification can be complex and often requires specific testing to meet the criteria set forth by health authorities.

The two types of visual field tests mentioned—automated perimetry (often referred to as "automated visual field testing") and the 24-2 test pattern—are standard methods used to assess visual field loss quantitatively. The automated visual field test measures the sensitivity of various points in the visual field, providing a detailed map of any areas where vision is diminished or absent. The 24-2 test pattern specifically evaluates the central 24 degrees of the visual field, which is crucial for daily activities such as reading and driving.

Regarding your question about whether there is a conversion formula between the two testing methods, unfortunately, there is no direct formula that allows for a straightforward conversion of results from one test to another. Each test is designed to measure visual field loss in a specific way, and the results are interpreted based on the methodology of the test used. However, it is generally understood that significant loss in one test may correlate with substantial loss in another, but this is not guaranteed.

In your father's case, if he has already been assessed with an 8-point visual field test showing a 50% loss, it would be advisable to discuss this result with his healthcare provider. They may be able to provide insights into how this result might relate to the automated perimetry results. It is also important to note that the average defect of greater than 25 dB in the automated visual field test is a specific criterion that needs to be met for disability certification. If your father's visual field loss is severe enough, it may be possible to argue for his eligibility based on the results of the 8-point test, but this will ultimately depend on the discretion of the evaluating physician and the specific regulations in your area.

Given your father's mobility issues post-stroke, it may be beneficial to explore options for home-based assessments or telemedicine consultations with a specialist who can evaluate his condition without requiring multiple trips to the hospital. Some healthcare providers may offer home visits or can arrange for visual field testing to be done in a more accessible setting.

In summary, while there is no direct conversion between the two testing methods, the results from the 8-point visual field test can provide valuable information. It is crucial to work closely with healthcare providers to ensure that all relevant data is presented when applying for disability certification. If necessary, seek a second opinion or additional testing options that may be more convenient for your father.