Eye Hemorrhage Treatment: Self-Pay vs. Insurance Options

The issue of clearing blood clots within the eye?

Thank you for the previous doctor's response.
My father has already undergone cataract surgery, but prior to the surgery, he experienced an eye injury which may have caused bleeding inside the eye.
After the cataract and glaucoma surgeries, the doctor mentioned that there were blood clots in the eye.
More than a month has passed, and since the body has not absorbed the hematoma, surgery is required to remove it.
This brings up the issue of out-of-pocket expenses versus insurance coverage for the surgery.

To quote: "After a month during the follow-up visit, the doctor said the blood clots had not been absorbed, so surgery is needed to aspirate the clots.
There are two options: out-of-pocket and insurance.
My father mentioned that the out-of-pocket option does not require suturing the wound, while the insurance option requires two sutures.
However, my father's explanation was not very clear.
The out-of-pocket cost is NT$20,000, while the insurance only costs NT$1,500.
The price difference is quite significant.
I would like to ask the doctor what the differences are in the instruments or techniques used for the out-of-pocket versus the insurance-covered procedures, and whether there is any impact on the surgical outcome.
Is the difference mainly in the healing time of the postoperative wound? Which type of treatment does the doctor recommend? Thank you for your assistance."

Xiao Zhou, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2010/04/07

Dr. Wang Zhangji reply Ophthalmology

Self-funded vitrectomy can be performed without sutures due to the use of smaller instruments, resulting in faster recovery and less foreign body sensation postoperatively.

Reply Date: 2010/04/07

More Info

When considering the treatment options for eye hemorrhage, particularly in the context of your father's situation following cataract and glaucoma surgery, it's important to understand the differences between self-pay (out-of-pocket) and insurance-covered (government or private insurance) procedures.
In your father's case, the presence of blood clots in the eye after surgery necessitates further intervention. The decision to proceed with surgery to remove these clots can be influenced by several factors, including the type of payment option chosen.

Differences Between Self-Pay and Insurance Options
1. Cost: As you've noted, the cost difference between self-pay and insurance-covered procedures can be significant. In your father's case, the self-pay option is approximately $2,000, while the insurance-covered option is around $1,500. This disparity is often due to the types of materials and techniques used in the procedures. Self-pay options may utilize more advanced or specialized equipment, which can lead to a higher cost.

2. Surgical Techniques and Equipment: Self-pay procedures often employ more advanced surgical techniques and equipment. For instance, the self-pay option may involve smaller instruments that allow for less invasive surgery, which can lead to quicker recovery times and less postoperative discomfort. Conversely, insurance-covered procedures might involve traditional methods that require suturing, which can prolong recovery and increase the risk of complications.

3. Postoperative Care and Recovery: The recovery time can differ based on the surgical method used. Self-pay procedures that do not require suturing may allow for faster healing and less postoperative pain. In contrast, insurance-covered procedures that involve suturing may require more careful monitoring and a longer recovery period. This can affect the overall outcome and the patient's comfort during the healing process.

4. Effectiveness and Outcomes: While both self-pay and insurance-covered procedures aim to achieve the same outcome—removal of blood clots and restoration of vision—the techniques used can influence the effectiveness of the surgery. Self-pay options may offer a more refined approach, potentially leading to better visual outcomes and fewer complications. However, it is essential to consult with the ophthalmologist to understand the specific techniques being used in each case.

Recommendations for Treatment
Given the circumstances, it is crucial to weigh the pros and cons of each option. If your father is in good health and the financial aspect is manageable, opting for the self-pay procedure may provide a quicker recovery and potentially better outcomes. However, if cost is a significant concern, the insurance-covered option is still a viable choice and can effectively address the issue of blood clots.

Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision should be made in consultation with the ophthalmologist, who can provide insights based on your father's specific medical condition and the expected outcomes of each procedure. It is also advisable to discuss any concerns regarding the surgical techniques, recovery times, and potential risks associated with each option. Understanding these factors will help you make an informed decision that aligns with your father's health needs and financial situation.

Similar Q&A

Changes in Eye Injection Procedures: From Insurance to Out-of-Pocket Costs

Hello, Director. I would like to ask if starting from 2022, the intravitreal injection surgeries for vitreous hemorrhage and edema have been changed from "National Health Insurance" coverage to "out-of-pocket" expenses? Thank you.

Dr. Gao Pilin reply Ophthalmology
Wong Bok (baby bok choy): If it meets the health insurance criteria, it should be covered. However, some medications may require out-of-pocket expenses. I apologize, as I am not performing this surgery, so the information may not be entirely accurate; it is best to consult a reti...

Understanding Retinal Microvascular Rupture: Risks and Treatment Options

Hello, Doctor! My father is 47 years old and has hereditary diabetes, but he has never had any issues, and his blood sugar has been well controlled. One day, he suddenly lost vision in his left eye and went to Changhua Christian Hospital, where they diagnosed him with a ruptured ...

Dr. Wang Zhangji reply Ophthalmology
Surgery can be covered by health insurance and requires hospitalization, unless a minimally invasive approach is chosen, which may involve some out-of-pocket expenses. The advantage of this method is that it results in a smaller incision and does not require sutures. If surgery i...

Can Macular Hemorrhage in the Left Eye Heal on Its Own?

In February 2021, I experienced a similar condition in my right eye and visited the Hsinchu Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. The doctor advised that it is generally best to wait for the hemorrhage to resolve on its own, and that surgery is not necessary; treatment...

Dr. Gao Pilin reply Ophthalmology
Hello: If your right eye has already been treated under the guidance of a physician and the symptoms have been controlled, you can continue to closely monitor the condition of your right eye. However, since your left eye has exhibited similar symptoms, it is advisable to promptly...

Managing Eye Shadows: Addressing Hemorrhage and Cataract Surgery

Hello Doctor: My mother previously experienced a microvascular rupture in her eye due to an impact, resulting in a red spot that has persisted for 1.20 years. The red spot is causing a shadow in her vision. She is currently preparing for cataract surgery in one eye. I would like ...

Dr. Gao Pilin reply Ophthalmology
Hello: Based on the situation you described, your mother may be considering cataract surgery while also dealing with a 1.20-year issue of microvascular rupture-related hemorrhage in her eyes. These symptoms are typically caused by different ocular conditions and need to be addres...