Exploring Non-Radiation Imaging Options for Abdominal Mass Evaluation

Examination methods for a right lower abdominal mass?

Thank you for your response, Doctor.

1.
If you can feel the lump, can the physician also feel it? The surgeon and gastroenterologist can feel it, but they also said they are unsure what it is.

2.
The ultrasound did not detect anything.
The doctor at National Taiwan University found a serrated, unnatural image, while the doctor at Maokong said there was no issue.

3.
The gastroenterologist's inference makes sense (I had a colonoscopy five months ago, so it shouldn't be this problem).
Thank you for your insights, Doctor.

If you are still concerned about cancer, you can choose to have either A) a CT scan plus a colonoscopy or B) a self-paid PET scan costing between 30,000 to 50,000 NTD.

I had an abdominal CT scan in October and a colonoscopy in May, so is the doctor suggesting I should have another one?
Regarding the PET scan, since I have been experiencing discomfort in my neck since July, I have already undergone two neck CT scans and one neck PET scan to check my thyroid, along with over ten X-rays.
In October, I discovered a lump in my lower right abdomen and was scheduled for an abdominal CT scan and over ten additional X-rays.
I feel like the radiation exposure is nearing the limit, yet the cause of the issue remains undetermined.

Could you please advise if there are any non-radiation-based examination methods available? For example, MRI or other examination methods? Additionally, I would like to know if other non-radiation examination methods would be helpful in identifying the cause of the abdominal lump and if they can detect any issues.
Thank you for your assistance in clarifying these matters.

Alen, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2014/12/23

Dr. Chen Sirong reply Oncology

If you are still afraid of cancer, Alen, you can choose option A: a CT scan and a colonoscopy, or option B: a self-paid PET scan costing between 30,000 to 50,000 NTD.
You had an abdominal CT scan in October and a colonoscopy in May, so the doctor is suggesting another test.
The question is whether you trust the results from the abdominal CT scan in October and the colonoscopy in May.
If you believe the results, then you are currently healthy.
If you do not trust the results, you will need to undergo either option A or B.
If you are concerned about the tests being too close together, you can wait three months and schedule the tests after January next year.
Thank you, Dr.
Tao.
Chen Si-Rong.

Reply Date: 2014/12/23

More Info

When evaluating an abdominal mass, especially when there are concerns about radiation exposure from multiple imaging studies, it is essential to explore non-radiation imaging options. The primary non-radiation imaging modality available is Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which can provide detailed images of soft tissues without the use of ionizing radiation.

MRI is particularly useful in assessing abdominal masses because it offers excellent contrast resolution, allowing for the differentiation of various tissue types. This is particularly beneficial when evaluating potential tumors, cysts, or other abnormalities in the abdominal organs. Unlike CT scans, which are better for visualizing bone and calcified structures, MRI excels in soft tissue imaging, making it a valuable tool for assessing organs such as the liver, kidneys, pancreas, and even the gastrointestinal tract.

In your case, where previous imaging studies (like CT and ultrasound) have not provided clear answers, an MRI could potentially offer new insights. It can help characterize the mass further, determining whether it is solid or cystic, and provide information on its relationship with surrounding structures. Additionally, MRI can help identify vascular involvement, which is crucial for surgical planning if intervention is necessary.

Another non-radiation option is ultrasound, which is often the first-line imaging modality for abdominal masses. While you mentioned that ultrasound did not detect the mass, it is worth noting that ultrasound can be operator-dependent, and the quality of the images can vary based on the technician's skill and the patient's body habitus. It is also a good tool for guiding biopsies if needed.

In terms of other non-invasive options, functional imaging techniques such as Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) can be used to visualize the biliary and pancreatic ducts without radiation. This could be particularly useful if there is a suspicion of biliary obstruction or pancreatic pathology.

It is also important to consider the clinical context and symptoms associated with the abdominal mass. If there are persistent symptoms such as pain, changes in bowel habits, or unexplained weight loss, these factors should guide the decision-making process regarding further imaging and potential interventions.

In summary, MRI is a highly effective non-radiation imaging option for evaluating abdominal masses. It can provide detailed information that may not be visible on CT or ultrasound. If you have concerns about radiation exposure, discussing the possibility of an MRI with your healthcare provider is advisable. They can help determine the most appropriate imaging strategy based on your specific situation, symptoms, and previous imaging results. Always remember that the ultimate goal is to arrive at a definitive diagnosis while minimizing unnecessary exposure to radiation.

Similar Q&A

Understanding Retroperitoneal Tumors: Diagnosis and Management Insights

Hello! In early October, during a physical examination, an abdominal ultrasound revealed left hydronephrosis. I was hospitalized in the urology department for an intravenous pyelogram (IVP), abdominal CT, and MRI (all with contrast injection), as well as ureteroscopy and retrogra...

Dr. Lai Yicheng reply Oncology
1. Can MRI determine whether a lesion is benign, malignant, or inflammatory? Answer: No, MRI cannot determine this. The indications for MRI include: head, cerebrovascular conditions, various spinal nerve disorders, tumors, abdominal, liver, spleen, pancreas, kidney lesions, pelvi...

Understanding Gallbladder Issues: Ultrasound vs. CT Scan Accuracy

Hello Doctor, during a health check, an abdominal ultrasound indicated a suspected 2 cm mass in the gallbladder, along with a 0.6 cm gallbladder polyp and some stones. I was advised to go to a larger hospital for further examination. Subsequently, I underwent a CT scan at the lar...

Dr. Hu Guozheng reply Gastroenterology and Hepatology
I recommend that you go to a major hospital for further examination. Later, I went to the major hospital for a CT scan, and the results seem to show no abnormalities. Please return for a follow-up appointment so that the attending physician can interpret the report, and then proc...

Understanding Varicocele: Is a CT Scan with Non-Ionic Contrast Safe?

Thank you for your response to my previous question. Today, during my follow-up appointment, the doctor said I need to undergo a CT scan. Do you think that's okay? Should a non-ionic contrast agent be used?

Dr. Xu Weikai reply Urology
Hello, CT!! Many people believe that more expensive tests provide clearer results. However, CT scans are not necessarily more diagnostic than abdominal ultrasounds. The effectiveness of ultrasounds is highly dependent on the operator's experience, which means that some condi...

Understanding Abdominal Tumors: X-rays, Ultrasound, or Endoscopy?

To determine whether there is a "tumor" in the abdomen, can X-rays and ultrasound provide sufficient information, or is a gastrointestinal endoscopy necessary? Thank you.

Dr. Hou Yongji reply Surgery
The abdomen contains many organs and tissues, so when it comes to tumors in the lower extremities, it is important to differentiate whether they are located in the abdominal wall or within the abdominal cavity. There are various examination options available, which depend on the ...