Computed Tomography (CT) scan
Thank you, doctor, for answering my questions previously.
Recently, besides the lymph nodes, I have noticed swelling in my neck near the shoulder area.
I'm not sure how long it has been swollen because I went to the clinic for a cold.
The doctor examined me for the cold and noted that the swelling was unusual, advising me to get it checked out by a family physician.
The family physician then referred me to an otolaryngologist.
The otolaryngologist performed an ultrasound and mentioned that it might be a hemangioma and ordered a CT scan.
However, the doctor said it appeared to be muscle, but there was a mass near the thoracic cavity that could be a lipoma or a myoma.
The doctor then referred me to a thoracic surgeon, stating that the CT results would also be sent to the thoracic surgeon for evaluation.
However, I received a call from the hospital today asking me to return for a repeat CT scan because the radiologist felt that the previous scan did not capture enough of the lower area, so I went for the scan and immediately went to see the thoracic surgeon afterward.
The surgeon examined me and palpated the swollen area, feeling a mass, but did not see anything significant on the imaging.
However, when I looked at the CT images with the thoracic surgeon, there were no images shown that matched what the otolaryngologist had shown me yesterday.
Therefore, my questions are:
1.
Is it possible to palpate a mass that is not visible on imaging? What is the likelihood of this? (All doctors from family medicine, otolaryngology, and thoracic surgery have palpated it.)
2.
Can a CT scan capture lymph nodes? I asked the otolaryngologist, and he mentioned that a previous ultrasound showed lymph nodes in my neck, and he reassured me that the CT scan was completed and there were no significant issues.
Does this mean that the lymph nodes in the head and neck are of reasonable size?
3.
The doctor mentioned that the lymph nodes on the CT images looked fine and were not enlarged, but there was something resembling a lymph node on the last slice, which could also be fat.
Even if it is a lymph node, it may not necessarily indicate a problem, although it is somewhat enlarged.
However, the doctor later stated that it did not quite resemble a lymph node, as there should have been imaging on the previous slice as well.
So, is it a lymph node or not? Since this lymph node is deep, I am unsure how to monitor it.
4.
Could this mass be a malignant metastasis that is not detectable in the groin area?
5.
Since the doctor did not ask me to return for a follow-up, will the CT report still be generated? If there are any issues with the report, will they notify me proactively?
I apologize for having so many questions, but if you could help answer them, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you.
Xiao Chen, 20~29 year old female. Ask Date: 2016/10/07
Dr. Hu Ziren reply Oncology
Hello, online user: If the tumor is large enough, it should typically be visible on imaging.
Additionally, the radiologist will provide a report after reviewing the images.
Therefore, I recommend scheduling an appointment with the pulmonary medicine department in about two weeks to review the report and also to monitor the size of the tumor.
Thank you!
Reply Date: 2016/10/07
More Info
Understanding CT scans in the evaluation of tumors is crucial for both patients and healthcare providers. Your concerns regarding the findings from your recent imaging studies are valid, and I will address your questions in detail.
1. Visibility of Palpable Masses on CT Scans: It is indeed possible for a mass that is palpable to not be visible on a CT scan. This can occur for several reasons, including the size of the mass, its composition (solid vs. cystic), and its location. For instance, small masses or those that are deeply located may not be captured well by the imaging technique used. Additionally, if the mass is located in an area that is difficult to visualize due to surrounding structures, it may not appear on the scan. The probability of this happening varies, but it is not uncommon in clinical practice.
2. CT Scans and Lymph Node Evaluation: CT scans are effective in evaluating lymph nodes, including those in the neck and chest. They can provide information about the size and characteristics of lymph nodes, which helps in determining if they are reactive (due to infection or inflammation) or suspicious for malignancy. If your ENT doctor indicated that the lymph nodes are of reasonable size and the CT scan corroborated this, it suggests that there are no significant abnormalities detected. However, the interpretation of lymph nodes can be nuanced, and sometimes further imaging or biopsy may be warranted if there is clinical suspicion.
3. Assessment of Lymph Nodes: The distinction between lymph nodes and other structures (like fat) can sometimes be challenging on imaging. If the radiologist noted a structure that could be a lymph node but also mentioned it might be fat, it indicates that the imaging characteristics are not definitive. In such cases, the clinical context and further imaging or biopsy may be necessary to clarify the nature of the finding.
4. CT Reports and Follow-Up: Typically, if there are any significant findings on a CT scan, the healthcare team will communicate these results to you. If the doctors did not schedule a follow-up appointment, it may suggest that they did not find any concerning abnormalities. However, you should always feel empowered to reach out to your healthcare provider for clarification on your results and any necessary follow-up.
5. Understanding Imaging Reports: If you have concerns about specific findings in your CT report, it is essential to discuss these with your physician. They can provide context regarding the significance of the findings and whether further investigation is warranted. If there is a concern about malignancy or other serious conditions, they will guide you on the next steps, which may include additional imaging, biopsy, or referral to a specialist.
6. Communication of Results: Most healthcare facilities have protocols in place to notify patients of significant findings. If there is a critical issue, they will typically reach out to you directly. However, if you have not received any communication and are anxious about your results, it is advisable to contact your healthcare provider for reassurance and to confirm that everything is in order.
In summary, CT scans are a valuable tool in the evaluation of tumors and lymph nodes, but they are not infallible. The interpretation of imaging studies requires a comprehensive understanding of the clinical context, and sometimes further evaluation is necessary. Always feel free to ask your healthcare provider for clarification on any aspect of your care, as they are there to support you through this process.
Similar Q&A
CT Scans for Tumor Detection: Accuracy, Safety, and Timing Explained
Can a CT scan be performed for the following tumor evaluations: 1. liver, spleen, kidneys, gallbladder, colon, small intestine, retroperitoneum, lymph nodes, prostate? 2. It is said that there are generally 0.5 cm or 1 cm distinctions; how much time does each take? 3. Does it hav...
Dr. Wu Bin'an reply Radiology
1. Computed tomography (CT) scans utilize an X-ray tube that rotates around the body, capturing data as the X-rays penetrate the body. This data is then reconstructed into images by a computer. CT scans can provide precise structural images of various body parts, which can be dis...[Read More] CT Scans for Tumor Detection: Accuracy, Safety, and Timing Explained
Understanding CT Imaging for Urological Conditions: Key Insights
Director Du: Hello, I am inquiring about case number 177786. I would like to ask you again: The CT/MRI diagnosis from 107/10 for renal hydronephrosis is described as follows: Note soft tissue lesion over the left iliac region with encasement of the left ureter and iliac artery, c...
Dr. Du Shixi reply Urology
Hello: 1) There are no masses on the CT scan; this type of endoscopy is more detailed. 2) When visiting a hospital, major hospitals typically provide reports if there are abnormalities in other areas. Wishing you good health.[Read More] Understanding CT Imaging for Urological Conditions: Key Insights
CT Scans for Liver Tumors: Radiation Risks and MRI Alternatives
Hello Dr. Sun, I recently had an ultrasound during my health check-up that revealed a liver tumor. The doctor has arranged for a CT scan. I would like to know if the radiation exposure from the CT scan poses a cancer risk for my future, or if I can opt for an MRI instead to exami...
Dr. Sun Shengyi reply Radiology
The radiation dose from computed tomography (CT) scans of the liver can vary significantly depending on different factors such as the number of scans, body composition, and the scanning area, with an average dose of approximately 14.0 mSv (ranging from 8.0 to 21.0 mSv). This dose...[Read More] CT Scans for Liver Tumors: Radiation Risks and MRI Alternatives
Can CT Scans Detect Tumors in the Retro-Duodenal Area?
I would like to ask if, in addition to enteroscopy, a CT scan can help determine the presence of a tumor at the posterior part of the duodenum?
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, a computed tomography (CT) scan may not necessarily reveal the presence of a tumor at the posterior end of the duodenum. CT is a non-invasive imaging technique, and its diagnostic accuracy can be influenced by the nature of the lesion (location, size, tumor characteristics...[Read More] Can CT Scans Detect Tumors in the Retro-Duodenal Area?
Related FAQ
(Oncology)
Radiation(Oncology)
Ct Scan(Radiology)
Ct Scan(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Neck Mass(Oncology)
Cancer Screening(Oncology)
Computed Tomography(Pulmonology)
Lump(Oncology)
Lymph Node Cancer(Oncology)
Pet Scan(Nuclear Medicine)