Nodule imaging follow-up comparison
Hello Dr.
Wang,
Thank you for your previous response.
I apologize for bothering you with one last question.
Regarding the nodule I consulted you about earlier, I would like to confirm whether this nodule was already present in the previous imaging, as I only have the images from the earlier examinations and the reports are no longer available.
Here are the comparisons of this time's imaging (the leftmost image is the most recent one, with a CT slice thickness of 3mm) with the previous two examinations done at other hospitals, which had a slice thickness of 5mm.
Could you please help me determine if the areas within the red boxes represent the same nodule? https://imgur.com/a/eBbLYci
Additionally, regarding your previous comment about the left side of the person, it should correspond to the image shown below, right? https://imgur.com/ovmM9Ow
I apologize for the inconvenience, and thank you for your help!
A-Bao, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2018/07/02
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Due to the varying angles of coronal reconstructions during each examination, the image on the far right (from the viewer's perspective) shows the left bronchus, while the image on the left does not.
Based on the images you provided, it cannot be confirmed that these are the same nodule, but it also cannot be ruled out.
A complete set of reconstructions for the entire area is necessary for confirmation.
It is best to utilize hospital computer-aided software or a medical imaging storage and transmission system for more reliable results.
I recommend consulting with a specialist at your original health check unit or a pulmonology outpatient clinic for expert advice.
Wishing you safety and success.
Sincerely, Yi-Fen Wang.
Reply Date: 2018/07/02
More Info
When interpreting imaging studies, particularly concerning nodular densities in the lungs, it's essential to understand the terminology and the implications of the findings. In your case, the X-ray report indicates "Nodular densities at LLL and LUL," which suggests that there are nodular opacities observed in the left lower lobe (LLL) and left upper lobe (LUL) of the lungs. These nodular densities could indeed represent pulmonary nodules, which are small round growths in the lung that can be benign or malignant.
The presence of nodular densities does not automatically imply that they are cancerous. Many factors influence the interpretation of these findings, including the patient's history, risk factors, and the characteristics of the nodules themselves (such as size, shape, and density). It is not uncommon for physicians to consider nodules as potentially benign, especially if they have stable characteristics over time or if the patient has a low risk of lung cancer.
Regarding your question about why a CT scan was not immediately ordered, there could be several reasons. The physician may have assessed the nodules as stable based on previous imaging or may have deemed them to be of low concern based on clinical judgment. In some cases, physicians may choose to monitor the nodules over time with follow-up imaging rather than proceeding directly to a CT scan, especially if the patient is asymptomatic and has no significant risk factors for lung cancer.
However, if there is any uncertainty or if the nodules exhibit characteristics that raise suspicion, a CT scan is a valuable tool for further evaluation. CT scans provide more detailed images of the lungs and can help determine the size, shape, and growth rate of the nodules, which are critical factors in assessing their nature.
In your follow-up question regarding the comparison of nodules over time, it is crucial to have access to previous imaging reports and images to make a comprehensive assessment. If you have images from previous scans, comparing them with the current CT scan can help determine if the nodules are new, stable, or have changed in size or appearance. The red boxes you mentioned in your images may indicate the same nodules if they appear in similar locations and have similar characteristics across the different imaging studies.
In summary, while nodular densities in the lungs can be concerning, their interpretation requires a thorough understanding of the patient's clinical context and previous imaging findings. If there is any doubt or if the nodules have changed, further imaging, such as a CT scan, may be warranted. It is always advisable to discuss these findings and any concerns with your healthcare provider, who can provide personalized recommendations based on your specific situation.
Similar Q&A
Understanding Changes in Ground-Glass Nodules: What You Need to Know
Dr. Yang, I would like to ask about the CT scans. Today, I compared a CT scan from two years ago with one from a month ago. The doctor mentioned that I have two larger ground-glass nodules from last month; one of them has not changed much since two years ago, while the other has ...
Dr. Yang Wenda reply Pulmonology
Hello: Basically, not having an increase in size for two years is good news. As long as you do not smoke, it is recommended to have a chest X-ray every six months for monitoring. Whether it is scar tissue is subjective, and without a biopsy report, it cannot be confirmed. Follow-...[Read More] Understanding Changes in Ground-Glass Nodules: What You Need to Know
Understanding Changes in Lung Nodules: CT Scan Report Inquiry
On June 20, I had a chest CT that revealed a 5mm solid nodule at the right middle lobe (RML) (SE3 IM196). Subsequently, on September 29, I had a follow-up at the same hospital, and the results were as follows: Airway/lungs/pleura: two 5mm solid nodules at RML (SE3 IM40, 43) and a...
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
1. The patient lies on the examination table, and the scanning position of the equipment may vary relative to the patient's position on the table; it is not fixed for every examination. The marked location indicates the relative position of the images generated by the scan d...[Read More] Understanding Changes in Lung Nodules: CT Scan Report Inquiry
Monitoring Lung Nodules and Local Fibrosis: Key Insights and Follow-Up
Dear Director, I hope you are well. I previously consulted you on this platform on September 7, 2021, regarding my health check in October 2020, which showed pulmonary nodules and localized fibrosis on a low-dose CT scan (the case number for my last inquiry was 173071). At that t...
Dr. Yang Wenda reply Pulmonology
Hello: Congratulations on your recent CT report showing that the 3mm nodule has not increased in size and is no longer visible. It is likely that it was just an inflammatory lesion that has been absorbed. Local pleural thickening usually does not change significantly or disappear...[Read More] Monitoring Lung Nodules and Local Fibrosis: Key Insights and Follow-Up
Understanding Your Mammogram Report: What Mild Regressive Changes Mean
Hello Dr. Wang, this year I had a mammogram, and the report contains a section that says: "Mammographic lesions: Mild regressive change of the previous irregular equal-density nodule in the lower portion of the left breast, middle third, only seen on the MLO view." What...
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, the report generated by the physician includes descriptions of the imaging findings, comparisons with previous images, and the physician's final conclusions regarding the classification of the imaging results and recommendations for follow-up. According to the America...[Read More] Understanding Your Mammogram Report: What Mild Regressive Changes Mean
Related FAQ
(Radiology)
Ct Scan Radiation(Radiology)
Mri Report(Radiology)
Radiological Examination(Radiology)
Contrast Agent(Radiology)
Pet Scan(Nuclear Medicine)
Lung Nodule(Pulmonology)
Thyroid Nodule(Internal Medicine)
Liver Nodules(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Ct Scan Report(Cardiology)