Monitoring Lung Adenocarcinoma: Key Insights and Next Steps - Oncology

Share to:

Lung adenocarcinoma follow-up?


Dear Dr.
Chen,
I am a patient with lung adenocarcinoma.
On May 21 of this year, I underwent surgery to remove a malignant tumor (2.2 cm) from my right upper lobe and a nodule from the same side lower lobe.
The biopsy of the right lower lobe nodule also confirmed malignancy.
A PET scan on June 10 showed no evidence of metastasis, and the physician recommended genetic testing to determine eligibility for targeted therapy; otherwise, regular follow-up would suffice.
I started taking Iressa (Gefitinib) on June 17, and on September 3, tumor marker tests showed elevated levels (CEA: 9.94 ng/mL).
The physician switched my medication to Giotrif (Afatinib) and arranged a series of tests, some of which are summarized below:
(A) Exam: CT of the brain, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis with/without contrast enhancement on September 18, 2019.

COMPARISON: CT from August 1, 2019.
FINDINGS:
- Lungs and pleura:
-- Post-operative changes in the right lung with parenchymal bands.

-- Several stable nodules in the right upper lobe (RUL) and left upper lobe (LUL) measuring up to 7 mm (coronal view) at RUL (SE/IM: 8/26 12/45).

-- Other minor or non-specific lung parenchymal changes.
- Right renal stones and suspected old insult.
- Bones: Degenerative changes of the spine with marginal spur formation.
A 1.8 cm oval lesion with a sclerotic rim at the right ilium favored to be a non-aggressive lesion.
(B) NUCLEAR MEDICINE STUDY: Whole body FDG PET on October 11, 2019.
PET INDICATION: Rule out recurrence.
SCINTIGRAPHIC FINDINGS: Whole body PET from the vertex of the skull to mid-thighs was performed 60 minutes after intravenous injection of FDG.
The computer reconstructed coronal and sagittal images disclosed: Compared to the prior study on June 10, 2019,
* Near complete resolution of prior lesions with residual mild hypermetabolism near surgical materials in the right lung (SUVmax=1.8), favoring postoperative changes.

* Persistent mild hot spot at the right posterior iliac bone (SUVmax=3.3).

* No definite abnormal increased metabolism noted in the liver, adrenal glands, spleen, or pancreas.

* SUV: standard uptake value.
(C) EXAMINATION: MRI scan without and with Gadolinium contrast of the pelvis on November 18, 2019.
FINDINGS:
Bone(s):
> Pelvic bones: A nodular marrow-replacing lesion(s) with hypointensity on T2WI and peripheral hyperintensity on fat-suppressed T2WI and fat-suppressed post-enhanced T1WI at the right iliac bone.
Joint(s): Others:
> Several nonspecific lymph nodes in the bilateral inguinal regions.
The MRI results will be discussed in my next appointment.
Therefore, I would like to seek your professional opinion on the following questions:
(1) From the MRI report, can we determine whether the "nodular marrow-replacing lesion" is benign or malignant? Is it possible that it is an old injury that existed earlier? I have previously sustained an injury from falling from a height and have experienced discomfort in that area (iliac bone) for nearly ten years, requiring medical treatment.
(2) My next appointment is scheduled for mid-December.
Should I seek an earlier consultation for treatment? Is it necessary to consult other specialties (e.g., oncology or orthopedics)?
Thank you for your guidance!

Qiúzhù zhě, 60~69 year old female. Ask Date: 2019/11/22

Dr. Chen Yunfang reply Oncology


Hello: Based on the provided information, the reliability and accuracy of the three types of examinations are best with positron emission tomography (PET scan), which is the second option.
Both the first option, computed tomography (CT scan), and the third option, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have a high rate of false positives (to put it plainly, the reports can easily be misleading and cause unnecessary anxiety).
However, due to their convenience, many clinicians still choose these methods and rely on their own interpretation of the images.
It's important to note that the radiologist who interprets the reports has never seen you in person and does not inquire about your medical history (they are often too busy, generating hundreds of reports a day).
Therefore, they tend to include as many findings as possible (more findings may lead to more errors, but it’s the clinical physician who has to deal with it; if something is omitted and a legal issue arises, the lack of documentation may not hold up in court).
According to your PET scan report, near complete remission is an excellent result, and you should continue with your current Giotrif treatment.
The abnormalities noted in the MRI were not mentioned in the PET scan, and I would consider that a false alarm; perhaps it is just an old injury as you mentioned.
Thank you for your inquiry.

Reply Date: 2019/11/22

More Info


Monitoring lung adenocarcinoma, especially after surgical intervention, is a critical aspect of patient care. Given your recent history of surgery for a 2.2 cm malignant tumor in the right upper lobe and subsequent treatment with targeted therapy, it is essential to understand the implications of your follow-up imaging and laboratory results.


Understanding Your Current Situation
1. Surgical History and Initial Findings: You underwent surgery to remove a malignant tumor, and post-operative imaging (including PET scans) indicated no evidence of metastasis. This is a positive sign, as it suggests that the cancer has not spread beyond the primary site.

2. Current Treatment: You were initially prescribed Iressa (Gefitinib), a targeted therapy for lung adenocarcinoma, but due to elevated tumor markers (CEA levels), your physician switched you to Giotrif (Afatinib). Elevated CEA levels can indicate the presence of cancer, but they are not definitive on their own. It is crucial to monitor these levels alongside imaging studies.

3. Imaging Studies: The recent CT and PET scans show stable nodules and post-operative changes, which is reassuring. The PET scan indicated near-complete resolution of prior lesions, with only mild hypermetabolism near surgical sites, which is likely due to post-operative changes rather than active disease.


Key Insights for Monitoring
1. Regular Follow-Up: Given your history, regular follow-up is essential. This typically includes imaging studies every 3 to 6 months for the first two years post-surgery, followed by less frequent imaging if no recurrence is detected. The goal is to catch any potential recurrence early.

2. Understanding Imaging Results: The MRI findings of a "nodular marrow-replacing lesion" in the right iliac bone need careful interpretation. While it could represent a benign process, such as a hematoma or a benign bone lesion, it is essential to correlate this with your clinical history and symptoms. Given your past trauma to that area, it could be related to that injury. However, further evaluation may be warranted to rule out malignancy.

3. Consultations with Specialists: If there are concerns regarding the MRI findings or if your symptoms persist, it may be beneficial to consult with an oncologist or an orthopedic specialist. They can provide further insights into the nature of the bone lesion and whether any additional imaging or biopsy is necessary.


Next Steps
1. Monitor Tumor Markers: Continue to monitor your CEA levels and discuss any significant changes with your healthcare provider. Elevated levels may necessitate further investigation.

2. Follow-Up Imaging: Ensure that you adhere to the follow-up imaging schedule as recommended by your oncologist. If any new symptoms arise or if there are changes in your health status, do not hesitate to seek earlier evaluation.

3. Discuss Treatment Options: If there is any indication of recurrence or if your tumor markers continue to rise, discuss potential adjustments to your treatment plan with your oncologist. This may include considering other targeted therapies or clinical trials.

4. Stay Informed and Engaged: Educate yourself about lung adenocarcinoma and its management. Being informed will help you engage in discussions with your healthcare team and make decisions that align with your treatment goals.


Conclusion
Monitoring lung adenocarcinoma involves a multi-faceted approach that includes regular imaging, laboratory tests, and consultations with specialists. Your proactive engagement in your care, along with the guidance of your healthcare team, will be crucial in navigating the post-operative landscape and ensuring the best possible outcomes. Always feel empowered to ask questions and express concerns during your follow-up visits, as this is an essential part of your care journey.

Similar Q&A

Understanding Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening Results and Next Steps

The low-dose lung cancer screening report indicates slight fibrotic changes in the left apex of the lung and a nodule in the right lung lobe (SE/IM: 3/51, 98), with a maximum diameter of approximately 0.3 cm (SE/IM: 3/98). Continuous follow-up with a CT scan is recommended. Addit...


Dr. Wang Lanfeng reply Pulmonology
Hello: Based on your description, there are currently no significant abnormalities in your examination report. It is recommended to continue monitoring. Quitting smoking will also help improve your health condition. Thank you.

[Read More] Understanding Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening Results and Next Steps


Should You Wait Six Months to Monitor a 0.5 cm Lung Tumor?

Hello, doctor. I underwent a health check-up and had a test for the lung cancer tumor marker Cyfra 21-1, which resulted in a value of 5.8 (with a reference range of <3.3). I later had a CT scan that revealed a 0.5 cm tumor in my lung, but the doctor advised me to return for fo...


Dr. Huang Yiwen reply Pulmonology
Dear emilycarry: Your concerns are valid; it can be unsettling to monitor abnormal data without further investigation. However, the situation you mentioned is indeed a blind spot in pulmonology. It may also be important to know if there is a history of smoking, any other chronic ...

[Read More] Should You Wait Six Months to Monitor a 0.5 cm Lung Tumor?


Understanding Hemoptysis After Lung Adenocarcinoma Surgery: What to Know

Your question: Hello, I am a stage 3B lung adenocarcinoma patient currently undergoing treatment with Anlotinib. I had surgery on November 3rd, and it has been almost two months since the operation. Recently, I have noticed a small amount of blood in my cough when I wake up in th...


Dr. Huang Yiwen reply Pulmonology
Dear Xiao Ke: Taking Alectinib is appropriate for cases of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma. After surgery, having just completed a CT scan with no signs of deterioration suggests that it is likely not a progression of the disease. It could be caused by a cough leading to minor p...

[Read More] Understanding Hemoptysis After Lung Adenocarcinoma Surgery: What to Know


Understanding Adenocarcinoma in Lung Cancer: Treatment Options and Symptoms

Are there medications for adenocarcinoma of the lung? Lung cancer has several types, and adenocarcinoma is one of them. Symptoms include pain that radiates from the front of the chest, around the axilla, to the back. Thank you.


Dr. Jiang Zhenyuan reply Pulmonology
Adenocarcinoma is a type of lung cancer, primarily treated through surgical resection. Chemotherapy agents include Cisplatin and Gemcitabine, among others. Please consult a pulmonologist to confirm the diagnosis, and then seek treatment from either a pulmonologist or an oncologis...

[Read More] Understanding Adenocarcinoma in Lung Cancer: Treatment Options and Symptoms


Related FAQ

Lung Cancer

(Oncology)

Postoperative Lung Adenocarcinoma

(Pulmonology)

Lung Cancer

(Pulmonology)

Cancer Screening

(Oncology)

Pet Scan Report

(Oncology)

Lymphadenopathy

(Oncology)

Nasopharyngeal Cancer

(Oncology)

Breast Adenoma

(Oncology)

Blood

(Oncology)

Radiation

(Oncology)