Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)
Hello Dr.
Hong,
I would like to ask a few questions.
On October 29 and 30, I performed unprotected oral sex for only a brief period of two to three minutes, without ejaculation in the mouth or swallowing prostate fluid.
Afterwards, I rinsed my mouth with clean water.
On October 31, within 72 hours, I started PEP (Post-Exposure Prophylaxis) treatment with Tenofovir and completed the 28-day regimen, although I took the medication about half an hour late on a few occasions.
After consulting with the hospital pharmacist and physician, I was informed that taking the medication within an hour before or after does not affect its efficacy.
After taking the last dose of PEP on November 27, I had an HIV Ag/Ab Combo test on December 5, which returned negative.
I plan to have another test in early March, four months after completing the medication.
1.
Will the timing of the medication affect its efficacy?
2.
How accurate is the negative result from the HIV Ag/Ab Combo test on December 5? Can it be trusted?
3.
If the test in early March also returns negative, can I completely rule out the risk of infection?
4.
If PEP is taken consistently and on time for 28 days, is it true that the success rate is over 90%?
5.
Lastly, what is the risk level associated with unprotected oral sex? Is it considered high, medium, low, or very low risk?
Thank you very much for your assistance, Dr.
Hong!
Chen, 20~29 year old female. Ask Date: 2023/02/13
Dr. Hong Yuanbin reply Internal Medicine
Hello, 1.
It should not affect the efficacy of the medication.
2.
The accuracy is high; as long as you have not engaged in any unsafe behaviors during this period, it should be reliable.
3.
The chance of infection is very low.
4.
Yes.
5.
It falls into the moderate to high-risk category.
Thank you for your question.
Reply Date: 2023/02/13
More Info
Understanding Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) is crucial for anyone who may have been exposed to HIV. PEP is a preventive treatment that involves taking antiretroviral medications after potential exposure to HIV to reduce the risk of infection. Here, I will address your questions regarding the effectiveness of PEP, testing accuracy, and the risks associated with oral exposure.
1. Effectiveness of PEP: You mentioned that you took PEP (Biktarvy) within 72 hours of potential exposure and completed the full 28-day regimen. The effectiveness of PEP is indeed high when taken correctly; studies suggest that it can reduce the risk of HIV infection by more than 90% when initiated promptly after exposure. The slight delay in taking the medication (up to 30 minutes late on a few occasions) should not significantly impact its effectiveness, as most guidelines indicate that a one-hour window does not compromise the treatment.
2. Testing Accuracy: Your HIV Ag/Ab Combo test on December 5 was negative, which is a positive sign. The accuracy of this test is generally high, especially when performed at least 4 weeks after potential exposure. Since you were on PEP, it is important to note that while PEP does not typically affect the results of the HIV test, it is recommended to wait for a conclusive result after completing the regimen. The negative result you received is indeed trustworthy, especially if you have not engaged in any further high-risk behaviors since starting PEP.
3. Future Testing: Regarding your follow-up test in March, if that test also returns negative, it would provide a strong indication that you have not contracted HIV. However, it is essential to understand that while the risk is significantly reduced, no test can guarantee 100% certainty. The recommended follow-up period after completing PEP is typically 3 months to ensure that any potential infection is detected.
4. Success Rate of PEP: The success rate of PEP is indeed reported to be over 90% when taken as prescribed. Adherence to the medication schedule is critical for maximizing its effectiveness. Since you have completed the full course and have tested negative, you have significantly lowered your risk of HIV infection.
5. Risk Assessment of Oral Exposure: The risk of HIV transmission through oral sex is generally considered to be low, especially in the absence of ejaculation in the mouth or the presence of cuts or sores in the mouth. In your case, since you engaged in brief oral sex without ejaculation and rinsed your mouth afterward, the risk remains low. However, it is not zero, particularly if there are open wounds or bleeding gums involved, as these can increase susceptibility to infection.
In summary, your proactive approach to seeking PEP and subsequent testing is commendable. Continue to follow up with your healthcare provider for any additional testing and guidance. It is also advisable to maintain open communication with sexual partners about HIV status and safe practices to further reduce risk. Remember, regular testing and safe sex practices are key components of sexual health.
Similar Q&A
Assessing the Need for PEP After Anal Oral Contact: A Urology Perspective
Dear Dr. Du, based on your response today, it seems that the risk of analingus (receiving analingus) is lower compared to unprotected oral sex. Is there a need for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in this case (non-homosexual activity)? If the risk is low, should I just have a blo...
Dr. Du Shixi reply Urology
Hello: This issue may require a consultation with an infectious disease outpatient clinic to determine if medication is necessary.[Read More] Assessing the Need for PEP After Anal Oral Contact: A Urology Perspective
Understanding Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) Testing and Symptoms
Hello Dr. Liao, I engaged in sexual activities on March 17, which included approximately 30 seconds of unprotected oral sex and about 1 to 3 minutes of protected vaginal intercourse. There were around 10 thrusts, but the condom was not fitted properly. When I withdrew, only the t...
Dr. Liao Zhongxin reply Internal Medicine
Dear readers: Regarding the topic of body temperature fluctuations and sweating after fever, here is the response: A: 1. If prophylactic treatment (PEP) was initiated within 66 hours and completed a 4-week course on April 16, you should be able to feel reassured. 2. Since the w...[Read More] Understanding Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) Testing and Symptoms
Assessing Low Risk and Medication Timing in PEP Treatment
Hello, doctor. On August 1st, around 4:30 PM, I received oral sex from a partner, and I ejaculated in their mouth. This was the only sexual activity. On August 3rd, I went to the hospital for preventive medication (PEP). The doctor assessed my risk as very low and prescribed me C...
Dr. Hong Yuanbin reply Internal Medicine
Hello, if there are no wounds or bleeding in the affected area, the chance of infection is indeed very low. A 40-minute duration should have a minimal effect from the medication. Thank you for your question.[Read More] Assessing Low Risk and Medication Timing in PEP Treatment
Understanding HIV and HPV Risks: PEP Efficacy and Autoimmune Concerns
Hello, Doctor. I have a question. After performing oral sex on a woman, I noticed small red spots on my abdomen two days later, which made me very anxious. I quickly went to a clinic and had a blood test for HIV, which came back negative. I started taking post-exposure prophylaxi...
Dr. Liao Zhongxin reply Internal Medicine
First, let's look at the information about HIV: The HIV virus has three main transmission routes: 1. Sexual transmission: Engaging in oral, anal, or vaginal intercourse without a condom with an HIV-infected individual or exchanging other bodily fluids carries a risk of infec...[Read More] Understanding HIV and HPV Risks: PEP Efficacy and Autoimmune Concerns
Related FAQ
(Internal Medicine)
Oral Cavity(Internal Medicine)
Health Report(Internal Medicine)
Drug Allergy(Internal Medicine)
Throat(Internal Medicine)
Gastrointestinal(Internal Medicine)
Lips(Internal Medicine)
Astrazeneca Vaccine(Internal Medicine)
Accidental Ingestion(Internal Medicine)
Hiv Screening(Internal Medicine)