Radiation dose-related issues?
Hello, doctor.
In July of this year, I underwent a head CT scan at the hospital because I was concerned about the possibility of something abnormal in my head.
After the examination, I was worried about the radiation exposure, so I inquired with the hospital about the radiation dose.
They informed me that the DLP (Dose Length Product) for my head CT scan was 1136.
Is this number considered high or within the normal range?
I also researched the conversion factor (k-factor) online, and I found that some sources indicate it is 0.0021 while others state it is 0.0023.
Which value is correct? I subsequently calculated the effective dose in millisieverts by multiplying 1136 by both 0.0021 and 0.0023, resulting in values of 2.38 and 2.61 mSv, respectively.
What is the increased risk of cancer associated with this head CT scan? Additionally, is there a latency period for cancer development? I am quite anxious about this, so I appreciate your response.
Thank you.
John, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2023/08/17
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, the displayed DLP value for the head is within the normal range.
The radiation dose from a single head CT scan is approximately 2 millisieverts.
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine issued a public statement in 2011 stating that if the radiation dose from a single "radiological examination" is less than 50 millisieverts, and multiple "radiological examinations" are performed within a short period (such as one year) with a total dose of less than 100 millisieverts, the potential risks associated with the "radiation dose" can be considered negligible, or even non-existent.
Following your doctor's instructions to undergo radiation-related examinations is advisable, as the health benefits outweigh the effects of radiation.
If you have concerns, it is recommended to communicate with your physician before proceeding with the examination.
Do not avoid examinations out of fear of radiation, as this may lead to missed opportunities for disease treatment.
Please refer to the above information, and wish you safety and health.
Ministry of Health and Welfare radiation examination press release: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-5023-64571-1.html American Radiologic Technologists website: https://www.xrayrisk.com/calculator/calculator.php
Reply Date: 2023/08/17
More Info
When it comes to concerns about radiation exposure from CT scans, it's essential to understand both the context of the exposure and the associated risks. Your inquiry regarding the DLP (Dose-Length Product) value of 1136 for your head CT scan is a valid concern, especially in light of the increasing awareness of radiation safety in medical imaging.
Understanding DLP and Radiation Dose
The DLP value is a measure of the total radiation dose delivered during a CT scan, expressed in mGy·cm. It is calculated by multiplying the CTDIvol (Computed Tomography Dose Index volume) by the length of the scan in centimeters. For head CT scans, typical DLP values can vary based on the specific protocol used, the type of CT scanner, and the patient's anatomy. Generally, a DLP value of around 600-800 mGy·cm is considered standard for head CT scans, although this can vary. A DLP of 1136 mGy·cm is on the higher side, but it is not uncommon for certain protocols, especially if the scan covers a larger area or if a higher resolution is required.
K Factor and Effective Dose Calculation
The K factor (conversion coefficient) you mentioned is used to convert DLP into an effective dose (in mSv). The values you found online (0.0021 and 0.0023) are both within a reasonable range for head CT scans, as the K factor can vary slightly based on the specific scanner and protocol used. Using these factors, your calculations yield effective doses of approximately 2.38 mSv and 2.61 mSv, respectively.
Cancer Risk Assessment
The risk of developing cancer from radiation exposure is often expressed in terms of a lifetime risk increase. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the risk of developing cancer from exposure to 1 mSv of radiation is estimated to be about 1 in 1,000. Therefore, for your effective dose of approximately 2.6 mSv, the increased risk of cancer would be roughly 2.6 in 1,000, or 0.26%. This is a very small increase in risk, especially when compared to the baseline risk of cancer in the general population, which is about 1 in 3 or 33%.
Latency Period for Cancer
Regarding your question about latency, cancer can have a long latency period, often taking years or even decades to develop after exposure to radiation. The exact time frame can vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including the type of cancer, the dose of radiation, and individual susceptibility. For most radiation-induced cancers, the latency period is typically several years to decades.
Conclusion
In summary, while your DLP value of 1136 mGy·cm is higher than average, it is essential to consider the context of your medical need for the scan. The effective dose you received (approximately 2.6 mSv) results in a very small increase in cancer risk. It is crucial to balance the benefits of obtaining necessary diagnostic information against the potential risks of radiation exposure. If you have ongoing concerns, discussing them with your healthcare provider can provide additional reassurance and clarity regarding your specific situation and any future imaging needs. Remember, medical imaging is a valuable tool, and when used judiciously, the benefits often outweigh the risks.
Similar Q&A
Understanding Radiation Risks of Full-Body CT Scans: What You Need to Know
Hello, doctor. Thank you for your previous response, but I still have some concerns that I would like to further inquire about: 1. Is a whole-body CT scan considered a high or excessive radiation dose examination? Is it not suitable for generally healthy individuals? 2. Can a who...
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans are considered low-dose radiation examinations. Whether this method is suitable for an individual should be assessed by a clinical physician. A single whole-body CT scan does not cause functional damage to the body. If you experien...[Read More] Understanding Radiation Risks of Full-Body CT Scans: What You Need to Know
Understanding Radiation Exposure: Concerns After Medical Imaging Procedures
Hello Doctor: I would like to ask you a few questions that have been troubling me for a long time and causing me concern. I appreciate your clarification on the following situations: In mid-July, I underwent coronary angiography (with contrast agent) with a dose of 1166, approx...
Dr. Wang Yifen reply Radiology
Hello, according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) report 103, doses below 100 millisieverts (including single or multiple exposures) do not cause clinically significant functional impairment. The radiation examinations you mentioned will not excee...[Read More] Understanding Radiation Exposure: Concerns After Medical Imaging Procedures
Understanding Radiation Dose: Concerns After a Pelvic CT Scan
Hello Dr. Chang, I recently underwent a pelvic CT scan at a certain hospital and called the staff there to inquire about the radiation dose. However, the staff member mentioned that he couldn't determine the radiation dose from the data (because it requires conversion, and ...
Dr. Zhang Zheng'ang reply Radiology
Hello, a computed tomography (CT) scan requires a significant amount of radiation dose to obtain sufficient imaging information for diagnosis. A typical abdominal CT scan has a dose of about 10 mSv. Doses ranging from 2 to 10 mSv are considered low for the human body, but the med...[Read More] Understanding Radiation Dose: Concerns After a Pelvic CT Scan
Concerns About Radiation Exposure from Multiple CT Scans After a Fall
Hello, doctor. I had an accidental fall from a height on August 13, which was life-threatening at the time. I underwent a full-body CT scan and subsequently had various surgeries that also utilized CT imaging. After being discharged, I felt very uncomfortable and was readmitted t...
Dr. Ye Weicheng reply Radiology
Hello Ms. Lin: Radiation has existed since the formation of the Earth, and both biological evolution and humans have developed a certain level of tolerance to it. Currently, we categorize radiation damage into two types: deterministic effects and stochastic effects. Deterministic...[Read More] Concerns About Radiation Exposure from Multiple CT Scans After a Fall
Related FAQ
(Radiology)
Ct Scan(Radiology)
Radiation(Radiology)
Ct Scan Report(Cardiology)
Ct Scan(Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Radiation(Oncology)
Computed Tomography(Pulmonology)
Pet Scan(Nuclear Medicine)
Mri Report(Radiology)
Contrast Agent(Radiology)