Myocardial Perfusion Scan Results and Next Steps - Cardiology

More Info

---

Understanding the results of a myocardial perfusion scan (MPS) is crucial for assessing heart health, particularly in the context of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Based on the provided report, the findings indicate a mild irreversible perfusion defect in the mid-to-basal anterior and infero-apical walls of the left ventricle. The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) is reported at 56% during stress and 51% at rest, which is still above the threshold of 45% that indicates preserved systolic function.

Key Findings Explained
1. Mild Irreversible Perfusion Defect: This suggests that there is some damage to the heart muscle in the specified areas, which may be due to previous ischemic events. The term "irreversible" indicates that the affected myocardial tissue may not recover fully, which is a concern for long-term heart health.

2. Ejection Fraction: The LVEF values of 56% during stress and 51% at rest indicate that the heart is functioning adequately, but the lower value at rest could suggest some degree of heart dysfunction. Normal LVEF ranges from 55% to 70%, so while your values are on the lower end, they are still within an acceptable range.

3. End Diastolic and Systolic Volumes: The end diastolic volume (EDV) and end systolic volume (ESV) values are within normal limits, which suggests that the heart is filling and emptying properly despite the mild hypokinesis (reduced movement) noted in the septal wall.

4. Summed Stress Score (SSS): An SSS of 4 indicates a low risk for significant coronary artery disease. This score is derived from the extent and severity of perfusion defects observed during the scan.

5. Transient Ischemic Dilation (TID) Ratio: A TID ratio of 0.96, which is less than 1.22, suggests that there is no significant stress-induced dilation of the left ventricle, which is a positive sign indicating that the heart is not severely compromised under stress.


Next Steps
Given these findings, the impression of "mild CAD involving the infero-apical wall" suggests that while there is some degree of coronary artery involvement, it is relatively mild and affects a small portion of the myocardium (less than 1%). The recommendation for follow-up examination is prudent, as it allows for monitoring of any changes in heart function or symptoms over time.


Consideration for Cardiac Catheterization
The decision to proceed with cardiac catheterization (also known as coronary angiography) typically depends on several factors, including:
- Symptoms: If you are experiencing significant chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of angina, further investigation may be warranted.

- Risk Factors: Your family history of CAD and previous episodes of chest pain, especially during cold weather, may increase your risk profile.

- Clinical Judgment: The cardiologist will consider your overall clinical picture, including the results of the MPS, your symptoms, and any other diagnostic tests.

In conclusion, while the results indicate some mild issues with myocardial perfusion, they do not necessarily confirm severe heart disease. It is essential to discuss these findings with your cardiologist, who can provide personalized recommendations based on your overall health status and risk factors. Regular follow-up and monitoring are crucial to ensure that any potential issues are addressed promptly.