Could you please tell me if my myocardial perfusion scan results (health booklet) indicate any heart problems? Do I need to undergo further coronary angiography?
PROCEDURE: 63674 MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SCAN WITH SPECT STUDY RESULT: Tc-99m MIBI resting and dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion gated SPECT shows relatively lower uptake of moderate extent in the anterior and lateral walls (10% of total myocardium, 4% of LAD territory, 14% of LCX territory) with equivocal reversibility.
The estimated post-stress ejection fraction is 75% (EDV 55ml, ESV 14ml) while the estimated resting ejection fraction is 70% (EDV 63ml, ESV 19ml), without regional wall motion abnormality.
Impression: More likely attenuation and normalization artifacts while less likely myocardial ischemia in the anterior and lateral walls of the left ventricle.
Patient height: 158 cm, weight: 57.5 kg.
Ms. Huang, 50~59 year old female. Ask Date: 2024/07/17
Dr. Chen Jili reply Cardiology
We recommend that you discuss the above situation further with your attending physician.
Thank you, and wishing you good health!
Reply Date: 2024/07/17
More Info
Understanding the results of a myocardial perfusion scan, particularly one conducted with SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography), is crucial for determining the next steps in evaluating heart health. In your case, the findings indicate a relatively lower uptake of the radiotracer in the anterior and lateral walls of the heart, which raises questions about potential ischemia or other underlying issues.
Key Findings from Your Report
1. Lower Uptake in Myocardial Regions: The scan shows a moderate extent of lower uptake in the anterior and lateral walls, which corresponds to 10% of the total myocardium. This suggests that there may be areas of the heart that are not receiving adequate blood flow, particularly in the territories supplied by the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries.
2. Ejection Fraction (EF): The estimated post-stress ejection fraction is 75%, and the resting EF is 70%. These values are within normal limits, indicating that the heart's pumping ability is preserved. However, the presence of lower uptake in specific regions could suggest that while the overall function is adequate, localized areas may be at risk.
3. Equivocal Reversibility: The term "equivocal reversibility" indicates that it is unclear whether the observed perfusion defects are due to true ischemia or artifacts related to the imaging process. This ambiguity necessitates further evaluation.
4. Absence of Regional Wall Motion Abnormality: The absence of wall motion abnormalities during the study is a positive sign, suggesting that the heart's overall mechanical function is intact despite the perfusion issues noted.
Next Steps: Do You Need Further Testing?
Given the findings, it is advisable to discuss the results with your cardiologist. Here are some considerations that may guide the decision for further testing:
1. Clinical Symptoms: If you are experiencing symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or fatigue, these should be taken seriously. Your clinical history and symptomatology play a significant role in determining the need for additional testing.
2. Risk Factors: Your risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) should be evaluated. Factors such as age, family history, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia can influence the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease.
3. Further Imaging or Testing: Depending on your cardiologist's assessment, they may recommend additional tests such as:
- Coronary Angiography: This invasive procedure can provide a direct view of the coronary arteries and help determine if there are significant blockages that require intervention.
- Cardiac MRI or CT Angiography: These non-invasive imaging techniques can provide more detailed information about heart structure and blood flow.
- Stress Testing: Another form of stress testing, possibly with exercise, may be considered to further evaluate the heart's response under physical stress.
4. Management Plan: If further testing is not deemed necessary, your cardiologist may suggest a management plan that includes lifestyle modifications, medication management, and regular follow-up appointments to monitor your heart health.
Conclusion
In summary, while your myocardial perfusion scan shows some areas of concern, the overall heart function appears to be preserved. The decision for further testing should be based on a comprehensive evaluation by your cardiologist, taking into account your symptoms, risk factors, and the specific findings of the scan. Open communication with your healthcare provider is essential to ensure that you receive the most appropriate care tailored to your individual health needs.
Similar Q&A
Understanding Myocardial Perfusion Scan Results and Next Steps
Hello, I would like to ask if the following test results confirm any heart issues, and whether a cardiac catheterization is necessary? Thank you for your response, I really appreciate it. PROCEDURE: 63674 MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SCAN WITH SPECT STUDY RESULT: 1) Mild irreversible p...
Dr. Wu Xueming reply Cardiology
The report indicates mild myocardial ischemia; please discuss subsequent treatment with the outpatient physician.[Read More] Understanding Myocardial Perfusion Scan Results and Next Steps
Understanding Abnormal ECG Results: Do You Need Further Heart Tests?
Hello Doctor, I visited a large hospital for an examination due to chest discomfort and underwent a 24-hour Holter monitor test. During my follow-up appointment, the cardiologist recommended further detailed tests, asking me to choose from the following options: 1. Nuclear medici...
Dr. Wu Xueming reply Cardiology
If the economic situation allows, it is recommended to directly undergo a CT scan, as all three tests are feasible but the CT scan is out-of-pocket.[Read More] Understanding Abnormal ECG Results: Do You Need Further Heart Tests?
Do I Need Further Heart Catheterization After My Stress Test Results?
Under standardized dipyridamole stress test, (1) no significant inducible ischemia in the myocardium, (2) adequate left ventricular (LV) systolic function. ================================================================================ Study: 26025B Stress & redistribution m...
Dr. Hong Yuanbin reply Internal Medicine
Hello, based on your report, there is no evidence of myocardial infarction or heart failure. Whether a cardiac catheterization is necessary should be determined by a cardiologist based on your symptoms and blood test results. It is recommended that you follow up with a cardiology...[Read More] Do I Need Further Heart Catheterization After My Stress Test Results?
Should I Seek Further Evaluation for Heart Issues After Tests?
Since November 2nd, I have experienced chest tightness and an increased heart rate. I went to a clinic where an electrocardiogram (ECG) indicated a heart issue, leading to a referral to the emergency department. However, blood tests, X-rays, and ECGs showed no abnormalities, and ...
Dr. Wu Xueming reply Cardiology
The myocardial perfusion scan results show no signs of hypoxia, indicating a very low likelihood of coronary artery disease.[Read More] Should I Seek Further Evaluation for Heart Issues After Tests?
Related FAQ
(Cardiology)
Test Report(Cardiology)
Cardiac Examination(Cardiology)
Echocardiogram(Cardiology)
Exercise Stress Test(Cardiology)
Ct Scan Report(Cardiology)
Blood Test(Cardiology)
Myocardial Infarction(Cardiology)
Afib(Cardiology)
Pulse(Cardiology)