Eye Hemorrhage Treatment: Self-Pay vs. Insurance Options

Removal of intraocular hemorrhage

The father sought medical attention due to unclear vision in his left eye.
After undergoing surgery for glaucoma and cataracts, the doctor indicated that there was a blood clot in the eye, which may require surgical intervention if it does not absorb on its own.
A month later, during a follow-up visit, the doctor stated that the blood clot had not been absorbed, necessitating a procedure to aspirate the clot.
There are two options: out-of-pocket payment and National Health Insurance (NHI).
The father relayed that the out-of-pocket option does not require sutures, while the NHI option requires two sutures.
However, the father's explanation was not very clear.
The out-of-pocket cost is NT$20,000, while the NHI cost is only NT$1,500.
The price difference is significant.

I would like to ask the doctor what the differences are in the instruments or techniques used between the out-of-pocket and NHI options, and whether there is any impact on the surgical outcomes.
Is the difference mainly in the healing time of the postoperative wounds? Which type of treatment does the doctor recommend? Thank you.

Xiao Zhou, 30~39 year old female. Ask Date: 2010/04/05

Dr. Wang Zhangji reply Ophthalmology

Based on your description, the out-of-pocket expenses likely refer to the intraocular lens that needs to be implanted during cataract surgery.
However, you also mentioned that your father has already undergone cataract surgery, which seems contradictory.
I recommend that you directly consult with the physician for clarification, or seek a second opinion from another doctor.

Reply Date: 2010/04/05

More Info

When considering the treatment options for eye hemorrhage, particularly in the context of your father's situation following cataract and glaucoma surgery, it's important to understand the differences between self-pay (out-of-pocket) and insurance-covered procedures.
In your father's case, the presence of blood clots in the eye that have not been absorbed naturally after a month necessitates surgical intervention. The two options available—self-pay and insurance—can vary significantly in terms of cost, surgical technique, and recovery.

Differences Between Self-Pay and Insurance Options
1. Cost: As you noted, the self-pay option is significantly more expensive at around $2,000 compared to the $1,500 for the insurance-covered procedure. This cost difference can be attributed to various factors, including the type of equipment used, the surgical techniques employed, and the overall facility fees.

2. Surgical Techniques and Equipment:
- Self-Pay: Typically, self-pay procedures may utilize advanced technology and minimally invasive techniques. For instance, the self-pay option may involve smaller instruments that allow for a procedure without the need for sutures. This can lead to a quicker recovery time and less postoperative discomfort.

- Insurance: The insurance-covered procedure might involve traditional techniques that require suturing. This could mean a longer recovery period and potentially more postoperative care. However, the effectiveness of the surgery in terms of removing the blood clot and restoring vision should not be significantly different between the two options.

3. Postoperative Recovery:
- Self-Pay: Patients often experience a faster recovery with less discomfort and fewer complications due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. The absence of sutures can also mean a lower risk of infection and quicker healing.

- Insurance: The recovery might take longer due to the need for sutures, which can also lead to a higher chance of postoperative complications such as infection or scarring.

Effectiveness of the Procedures
In terms of effectiveness, both self-pay and insurance options should ideally provide similar outcomes regarding the removal of blood clots and the restoration of vision. The choice between the two often comes down to personal preference, financial considerations, and the specific recommendations of the healthcare provider.

Recommendations
Given the circumstances, if your father is in good health and the financial burden of the self-pay option is manageable, it may be worth considering the self-pay procedure for its potential benefits in recovery time and comfort. However, if cost is a significant concern, the insurance-covered option is still a viable and effective choice.

Conclusion
In summary, both self-pay and insurance options have their pros and cons. The decision should be based on a combination of financial capability, the urgency of the situation, and the advice of the treating physician. It is crucial to have an open discussion with the healthcare provider about the risks, benefits, and expected outcomes of both options to make an informed decision that aligns with your father's health needs and financial situation. Always prioritize the quality of care and the expertise of the surgical team, as these factors will ultimately influence the success of the procedure.

Similar Q&A

Understanding Eye Hemorrhage Treatment: Self-Pay vs. Insurance Options

Thank you for the previous doctor's response. My father has already undergone cataract surgery, but prior to the surgery, he experienced an eye injury which may have caused bleeding inside the eye. After the cataract and glaucoma surgeries, the doctor mentioned that there we...

Dr. Wang Zhangji reply Ophthalmology
Self-funded vitrectomy can be performed without sutures due to the use of smaller instruments, resulting in faster recovery and less foreign body sensation postoperatively.

Changes in Eye Injection Procedures: From Insurance to Out-of-Pocket Costs

Hello, Director. I would like to ask if starting from 2022, the intravitreal injection surgeries for vitreous hemorrhage and edema have been changed from "National Health Insurance" coverage to "out-of-pocket" expenses? Thank you.

Dr. Gao Pilin reply Ophthalmology
Wong Bok (baby bok choy): If it meets the health insurance criteria, it should be covered. However, some medications may require out-of-pocket expenses. I apologize, as I am not performing this surgery, so the information may not be entirely accurate; it is best to consult a reti...

Understanding Retinal Microvascular Rupture: Risks and Treatment Options

Hello, Doctor! My father is 47 years old and has hereditary diabetes, but he has never had any issues, and his blood sugar has been well controlled. One day, he suddenly lost vision in his left eye and went to Changhua Christian Hospital, where they diagnosed him with a ruptured ...

Dr. Wang Zhangji reply Ophthalmology
Surgery can be covered by health insurance and requires hospitalization, unless a minimally invasive approach is chosen, which may involve some out-of-pocket expenses. The advantage of this method is that it results in a smaller incision and does not require sutures. If surgery i...

Can Macular Hemorrhage in the Left Eye Heal on Its Own?

In February 2021, I experienced a similar condition in my right eye and visited the Hsinchu Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. The doctor advised that it is generally best to wait for the hemorrhage to resolve on its own, and that surgery is not necessary; treatment...

Dr. Gao Pilin reply Ophthalmology
Hello: If your right eye has already been treated under the guidance of a physician and the symptoms have been controlled, you can continue to closely monitor the condition of your right eye. However, since your left eye has exhibited similar symptoms, it is advisable to promptly...